MHF vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund Inc (MHF) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
MHF is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Nov 28, 1988. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
MHF vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MHF vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MHF Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund Inc | 2.39% | 7.18% | 11.99% | 4.53% | -17.68% | 10.42% | 3.00% | 13.93% | -2.27% | 7.54% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 20.88% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | 0.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MHF achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 20.88% return. Over the past 10 years, MHF has underperformed EMO with an annualized return of 2.65%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.
MHF
- 1D
- 4.20%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- -0.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
EMO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 23.15%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 34.99%
- 5Y*
- 33.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MHF vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MHF has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MHF vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
MHF
EMO
MHF vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund Inc (MHF) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MHF | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | 0.91 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.05 | 1.28 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.20 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 1.07 | -1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 3.23 | -3.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MHF | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 0.91 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 1.25 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.23 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.12 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between MHF and EMO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MHF vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
MHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than EMO's 8.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MHF Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund Inc | 5.88% | 5.93% | 5.65% | 3.78% | 3.72% | 3.23% | 3.75% | 4.02% | 4.42% | 4.14% | 4.53% | 4.45% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.11% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
MHF vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MHF drawdown since its inception was -29.95%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHF and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MHF | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.95% | -95.06% | +65.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -18.81% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | -28.59% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.72% | -93.02% | +66.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | -2.55% | -3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -32.27% | +25.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.54% | 6.22% | +0.32% |
Volatility
MHF vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund Inc (MHF) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) have volatilities of 4.84% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MHF | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 4.63% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 11.12% | -2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.07% | 21.39% | -6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 26.78% | -12.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 41.41% | -27.90% |