PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHELX vs. SIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHELX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHELX achieves a 18.36% return, which is significantly higher than SIFAX's 8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MHELX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 8.91%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.50% annualized return.


MHELX

1D
-0.70%
1M
1.02%
YTD
18.36%
6M
18.63%
1Y
38.19%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
8.91%

SIFAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.82%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
7.46%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
3.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHELX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
18.36%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
8.21%7.82%4.08%-1.74%8.48%10.83%-1.59%5.68%-3.64%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MHELX and SIFAX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.24

The correlation between MHELX and SIFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHELX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHELX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MHELXSIFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

5.30

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.16

16.58

-1.43

MHELX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHELX and SIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHELXSIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.36

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

1.04

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.67

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.34

-0.01

Drawdowns

MHELX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHELX drawdown since its inception was -61.24%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHELX and SIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHELXSIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.24%

-23.62%

-37.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-2.41%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.81%

-3.57%

-27.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

-8.32%

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.02%

-14.69%

-24.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.72%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-8.55%

-4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

0.77%

+1.74%

Volatility

MHELX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 2.15%. This indicates that MHELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHELXSIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

2.15%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

4.68%

+10.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.28%

5.41%

+13.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

5.60%

+15.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

5.22%

+15.75%

MHELX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHELX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MHELX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

MHELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than SIFAX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.10%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.21%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHELX and SIFAX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to SIFAX (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHELX dropped -61.24% vs SIFAX's -23.62%.

SIFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHELX and SIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer