PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHELX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHELX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHELX achieves a 18.36% return, which is significantly higher than FRGAX's 9.05% return.


MHELX

1D
-0.70%
1M
1.02%
YTD
18.36%
6M
18.63%
1Y
38.19%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
8.91%

FRGAX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.72%
YTD
9.05%
6M
9.30%
1Y
22.09%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHELX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
18.36%3.45%12.51%16.30%-4.08%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
9.05%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MHELX and FRGAX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between MHELX and FRGAX has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHELX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHELX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MHELXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

3.12

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.16

13.96

+1.20

MHELX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHELX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHELXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.43

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.53

-1.20

Drawdowns

MHELX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHELX drawdown since its inception was -61.24%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHELX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHELXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.24%

-11.77%

-49.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-7.03%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.81%

-11.77%

-19.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.29%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-1.58%

-11.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.57%

+0.94%

Volatility

MHELX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) at 2.73%. This indicates that MHELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHELXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

2.73%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

7.20%

+8.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.28%

9.05%

+10.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

10.31%

+10.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

10.31%

+10.66%

MHELX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHELX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MHELX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

MHELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than FRGAX's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.84%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.10%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHELX and FRGAX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FRGAX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHELX dropped -61.24% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHELX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer