PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHD vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHD vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund (MHD) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHD achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MHD has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 0.54%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


MHD

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.12%
YTD
1.85%
6M
2.90%
1Y
10.70%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
-2.00%
10Y*
0.54%

WFSPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.80%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.72%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHD vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MHD
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund
1.85%7.04%3.38%2.06%-23.70%8.09%0.24%20.68%-5.47%8.08%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MHD and WFSPX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 1997

0.12

The correlation between MHD and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHD vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHD
MHD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHD vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund (MHD) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MHDWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.46

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.35

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

15.65

-8.69

MHD vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHD and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHDWFSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.52

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.85

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.87

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.13

+0.19

Drawdowns

MHD vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHD drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHD and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHDWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.95%

-58.21%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-8.90%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-18.74%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

-24.51%

-12.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.68%

-33.74%

-2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.99%

0.00%

-13.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-12.77%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.90%

-0.36%

Volatility

MHD vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund (MHD) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) at 2.82%. This indicates that MHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHDWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

2.82%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.76%

8.97%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.58%

11.85%

-3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

16.88%

-5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.03%

18.02%

-3.99%

MHD vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHD has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MHD vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

MHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than WFSPX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MHD
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund
6.12%6.08%5.58%3.82%5.63%4.34%4.49%4.62%6.11%5.86%6.16%6.25%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
1.56%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHD and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHD has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to WFSPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHD dropped -45.95% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHD and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer