PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHCAX vs. MBAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHCAX vs. MBAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX) and MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHCAX achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than MBAIX's 4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MHCAX has outperformed MBAIX with an annualized return of 9.83%, while MBAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.45% annualized return.


MHCAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.75%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
9.83%

MBAIX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.14%
YTD
4.97%
6M
5.53%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
7.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHCAX vs. MBAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MHCAX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A
1.40%6.44%6.90%11.27%42.57%5.10%4.82%12.76%-1.92%6.54%
MBAIX
MainStay Balanced Fund
4.97%11.38%7.59%7.56%-5.80%17.13%7.73%19.28%-7.53%9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between MHCAX and MBAIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995

0.36

The correlation between MHCAX and MBAIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHCAX vs. MBAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MHCAX
MHCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MHCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MHCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

MBAIX
MBAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MBAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MBAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MHCAX vs. MBAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX) and MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MHCAXMBAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.39

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

3.07

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.91

12.37

+4.54

MHCAX vs. MBAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MHCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the MBAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MHCAX and MBAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHCAXMBAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.09

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.63

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.71

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.80

-0.02

Drawdowns

MHCAX vs. MBAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHCAX drawdown since its inception was -29.62%, smaller than the maximum MBAIX drawdown of -39.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHCAX and MBAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHCAXMBAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.62%

-39.74%

+10.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.67%

-4.69%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.34%

-8.37%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.74%

-13.19%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.98%

-25.87%

+6.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.14%

-3.56%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

1.16%

-0.81%

Volatility

MHCAX vs. MBAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX) is 0.77%, while MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that MHCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHCAXMBAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

1.59%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.72%

5.17%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

6.87%

-4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

9.40%

+15.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

10.61%

+7.62%

MHCAX vs. MBAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHCAX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MBAIX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

MHCAX vs. MBAIX - Dividend Comparison

MHCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, less than MBAIX's 6.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBAIX
MainStay Balanced Fund
6.63%6.95%6.14%2.27%1.86%23.51%2.24%6.04%9.37%7.05%2.94%6.93%
MHCAX
MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A
5.98%6.06%5.90%5.56%40.91%5.00%5.52%5.58%5.94%6.20%5.69%6.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHCAX and MBAIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBAIX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to MHCAX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHCAX dropped -29.62% vs MBAIX's -39.74%.

MHCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHCAX and MBAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer