MGSEX vs. CNJFX
MGSEX (AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund) and CNJFX (Commonwealth Japan Fund) are both mutual funds - MGSEX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by AMG, while CNJFX is a Japan Equities fund managed by Commonwealth Intl Series Tr. Over the past 10 years, MGSEX returned 14.72%/yr vs 4.95%/yr for CNJFX. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MGSEX charges 1.18%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for CNJFX.
Performance
MGSEX vs. CNJFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGSEX achieves a 21.75% return, which is significantly higher than CNJFX's 18.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MGSEX has outperformed CNJFX with an annualized return of 14.72%, while CNJFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.95% annualized return.
MGSEX
- 1D
- 4.78%
- 1M
- -11.74%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- YTD
- 21.75%
- 1Y
- 45.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.61%
CNJFX
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- YTD
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 28.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 4.95%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MGSEX vs. CNJFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund | 21.75% | 41.56% | 7.23% | -4.82% | -27.91% | 0.83% | 38.74% | 80.58% | -3.77% | 20.26% |
CNJFX Commonwealth Japan Fund | 18.08% | 18.27% | -1.53% | 14.15% | -18.49% | -7.92% | 9.93% | 19.15% | -10.80% | 20.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGSEX and CNJFX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 1996 | 0.34 |
The correlation between MGSEX and CNJFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGSEX vs. CNJFX — Risk / Return Rank
MGSEX
CNJFX
MGSEX vs. CNJFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and Commonwealth Japan Fund (CNJFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGSEX | CNJFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 2.51 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | 7.64 | -1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGSEX vs. CNJFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGSEX drawdown since its inception was -62.06%, smaller than the maximum CNJFX drawdown of -73.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGSEX and CNJFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGSEX | CNJFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.06% | -73.98% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.18% | -11.44% | -13.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.18% | -17.82% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.34% | -36.47% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.32% | -36.47% | -8.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.61% | -30.49% | +8.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -49.80% | +35.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.71% | 3.76% | +2.95% |
Volatility
MGSEX vs. CNJFX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) has a higher volatility of 12.69% compared to Commonwealth Japan Fund (CNJFX) at 6.77%. This indicates that MGSEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNJFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGSEX | CNJFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.69% | 6.77% | +5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.00% | 14.98% | +14.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.93% | 18.99% | +12.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 18.37% | +3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.70% | 17.39% | +9.31% |
MGSEX vs. CNJFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGSEX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CNJFX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGSEX vs. CNJFX - Dividend Comparison
MGSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than CNJFX's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNJFX Commonwealth Japan Fund | 1.02% | 1.20% | 0.58% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 4.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 83.77% | 4.35% | 59.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGSEX and CNJFX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGSEX has higher volatility (12.69%) compared to CNJFX (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGSEX dropped -62.06% vs CNJFX's -73.98%.
CNJFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGSEX and CNJFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer