PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGRDX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGRDX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGRDX achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 27.01% return.


MGRDX

1D
0.45%
1M
3.75%
YTD
4.17%
6M
5.12%
1Y
11.83%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
10.06%

FISZX

1D
0.37%
1M
11.60%
YTD
27.01%
6M
32.57%
1Y
42.44%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGRDX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MGRDX
MFS International Growth Fund R6
4.17%21.18%9.22%14.99%-15.00%9.61%15.82%11.83%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
27.01%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MGRDX and FISZX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.86

The correlation between MGRDX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGRDX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGRDX
MGRDX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MGRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MGRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGRDX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGRDXFISZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.40

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.89

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.05

11.38

-8.33

MGRDX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGRDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGRDX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGRDXFISZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.21

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.50

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.65

-0.35

Drawdowns

MGRDX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGRDX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, which is greater than FISZX's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGRDX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGRDXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-39.92%

-20.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-14.48%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-14.63%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-39.92%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

0.00%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.43%

-12.37%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.66%

0.00%

Volatility

MGRDX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International Growth Fund R6 (MGRDX) is 3.92%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that MGRDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGRDXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

7.78%

-3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

16.22%

-5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.26%

18.93%

-5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

17.84%

-2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

18.27%

-2.50%

MGRDX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGRDX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGRDX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

MGRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than FISZX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.52%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGRDX
MFS International Growth Fund R6
5.40%5.63%6.35%2.90%3.06%6.97%0.80%1.51%4.20%2.61%1.45%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGRDX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to MGRDX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGRDX dropped -60.75% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGRDX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer