MGQIX vs. GGMMX
MGQIX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio) and GGMMX (Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MGQIX returned -1.19%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for GGMMX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.90% expense ratio.
Performance
MGQIX vs. GGMMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGQIX achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly lower than GGMMX's 18.47% return.
MGQIX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- 6M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- -29.23%
- 3Y*
- -1.42%
- 5Y*
- -1.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.55%
GGMMX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 18.47%
- 1Y
- 29.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.31%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- —
MGQIX vs. GGMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGQIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio | -2.26% | -19.55% | 16.34% | 21.69% | -20.69% | 18.61% | 15.97% | 16.01% |
GGMMX Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund | 18.47% | 10.57% | 1.65% | 39.12% | -16.24% | 19.30% | 15.86% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGQIX and GGMMX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2019 | 0.58 |
The correlation between MGQIX and GGMMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGQIX vs. GGMMX — Risk / Return Rank
MGQIX
GGMMX
MGQIX vs. GGMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio (MGQIX) and Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund (GGMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGQIX | GGMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.36 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 3.75 | -4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 12.55 | -13.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGQIX vs. GGMMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGQIX drawdown since its inception was -47.63%, which is greater than GGMMX's maximum drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGQIX and GGMMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGQIX | GGMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.63% | -40.23% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.59% | -8.11% | -29.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.63% | -23.46% | -24.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.63% | -28.23% | -19.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.98% | -2.79% | -38.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -9.70% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.44% | 2.42% | +21.02% |
Volatility
MGQIX vs. GGMMX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio (MGQIX) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund (GGMMX) at 3.51%. This indicates that MGQIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGQIX | GGMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 3.51% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 11.00% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.19% | 14.30% | +14.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.11% | 17.84% | +8.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 19.98% | +1.89% |
MGQIX vs. GGMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MGQIX and GGMMX have an expense ratio of 0.90%.
Dividends
MGQIX vs. GGMMX - Dividend Comparison
MGQIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGMMX Gabelli Global Mini MitesTM Fund | 5.71% | 6.77% | 0.00% | 11.14% | 6.22% | 14.98% | 0.54% | 3.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGQIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 30.72% | 0.47% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 2.54% | 4.84% | 8.37% | 5.51% | 8.22% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGQIX and GGMMX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGQIX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to GGMMX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGQIX dropped -47.63% vs GGMMX's -40.23%.
GGMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGQIX and GGMMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer