PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGPIX vs. FSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGPIX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGPIX achieves a 18.04% return, which is significantly higher than FSMAX's 14.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MGPIX has underperformed FSMAX with an annualized return of 7.31%, while FSMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.


MGPIX

1D
0.69%
1M
5.52%
YTD
18.04%
6M
18.20%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*
7.31%

FSMAX

1D
1.07%
1M
5.80%
YTD
14.89%
6M
13.61%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGPIX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund
18.04%5.56%13.77%15.40%-20.47%-6.46%20.28%24.09%-12.06%18.08%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
14.89%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MGPIX and FSMAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.95

The correlation between MGPIX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGPIX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGPIX
MGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGPIX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGPIXFSMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.87

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

2.60

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.12

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.64

11.05

+0.60

MGPIX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGPIX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGPIXFSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.87

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.31

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.40

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.46

-0.14

Drawdowns

MGPIX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGPIX drawdown since its inception was -54.61%, which is greater than FSMAX's maximum drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGPIX and FSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGPIXFSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.61%

-50.55%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-10.26%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.86%

-26.82%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.84%

-36.31%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.84%

-50.55%

+6.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-12.17%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.90%

-0.38%

Volatility

MGPIX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) at 4.70%. This indicates that MGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGPIXFSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

4.70%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

12.46%

+0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.79%

17.17%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.25%

22.33%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.25%

30.24%

-8.99%

MGPIX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGPIX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGPIX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

MGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%
MGPIX
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund
2.90%3.42%0.91%0.00%3.26%1.47%2.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MGPIX and FSMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGPIX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to FSMAX (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGPIX dropped -54.61% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

FSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGPIX and FSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer