PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGOV vs. XTEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGOV vs. XTEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF (MGOV) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGOV achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than XTEN's -1.22% return.


MGOV

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.83%
6M
-0.37%
YTD
-0.08%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.81%

XTEN

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.32%
6M
-1.02%
YTD
-1.22%
1Y
0.60%
3Y*
2.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$301.27K$575.46K$601.44K
$11.47M$8.89M$12.64M

MGOV vs. XTEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MGOV and XTEN is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2023

0.91

The correlation between MGOV and XTEN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGOV vs. XTEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGOV
MGOV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XTEN
XTEN Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGOV vs. XTEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF (MGOV) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGOVXTENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.02

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

0.11

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.18

0.26

+1.92

MGOV vs. XTEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGOV Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the XTEN Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGOV and XTEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGOV vs. XTEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGOV drawdown since its inception was -6.11%, smaller than the maximum XTEN drawdown of -13.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGOV and XTEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGOVXTENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-13.86%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.53%

-5.42%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-9.30%

+3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-4.17%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-4.01%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.35%

-0.89%

Volatility

MGOV vs. XTEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF (MGOV) is 1.31%, while BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that MGOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGOVXTENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

1.87%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.44%

4.86%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

6.14%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

9.45%

-3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

9.45%

-3.58%

MGOV vs. XTEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGOV has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XTEN's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGOV vs. XTEN - Dividend Comparison

MGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than XTEN's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MGOV
First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF
4.92%4.95%5.05%1.47%0.00%
XTEN
BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.43%4.05%4.21%3.71%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGOV and XTEN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTEN has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to MGOV (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGOV dropped -6.11% vs XTEN's -13.86%.

On 3-year performance, MGOV leads with 4.64% vs 2.43% for XTEN. On fees, XTEN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, MGOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MGOV has performed better with a 4.64% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTEN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for MGOV.

MGOV has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 4.43% for XTEN.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for MGOV and 0.07% for XTEN.

MGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGOV and XTEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer