MGMT vs. MOO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MGMT (Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGMT is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Inverdale Capital Management LLC, while MOO is a Natural Resources fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. MGMT is actively managed, while MOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MGMT returned 7.72%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for MOO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGMT charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for MOO.

Performance

MGMT vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGMT achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's 11.94% return.

MGMT

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 6.23%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 1Y: 22.77%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: —

MOO

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 3.68%
• 6M: 8.42%
• YTD: 11.94%
• 1Y: 12.19%
• 3Y*: 2.07%
• 5Y*: 0.16%
• 10Y*: 7.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGMT vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MGMT Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF	13.33%	6.96%	12.95%	17.87%	-14.54%	40.77%	5.49%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	11.94%	15.61%	-12.43%	-8.57%	-8.10%	23.99%	4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MGMT and MOO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between MGMT and MOO has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MGMT vs. MOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MGMT	MOO
Industrials	25.0%	21.7%
Technology	15.2%	-
Financial Services	12.6%	-
Energy	12.1%	-
Basic Materials	11.1%	25.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	-
Healthcare	6.5%	15.3%
Communication Services	4.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	37.8%
Real Estate	1.7%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MGMT vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGMT

MGMT Risk / Return Rank: 46
MGMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MGMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
MGMT Omega Ratio Rank: 43
MGMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MGMT Martin Ratio Rank: 44

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 28
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGMT vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGMT	MOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	0.85	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	1.32	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.15	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	1.10	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	2.84	+2.80

MGMT vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the MOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGMT and MOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGMT vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGMT drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGMT and MOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGMT	MOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.95%	-69.53%	+44.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.32%	-11.17%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.76%	-26.83%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.95%	-39.52%	+14.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-16.12%	+14.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-16.98%	+10.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.05%	4.31%	-0.26%

Volatility

MGMT vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison

Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGMT	MOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	4.33%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.06%	11.10%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	14.39%	+3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.48%	17.18%	+2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.49%	18.13%	+1.36%

MGMT vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGMT has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGMT vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

MGMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than MOO's 2.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGMT Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF	0.30%	0.34%	0.51%	1.16%	0.90%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.21%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGMT and MOO in my portfolio?

MGMT and MOO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGMT or MOO?

MGMT has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to MOO (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGMT dropped -24.95% vs MOO's -69.53%.

Which ETF is better, MGMT or MOO?

On 5-year performance, MGMT leads with 7.72% vs 0.16% for MOO. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MGMT or MOO?

Over the 5-year period, MGMT has performed better with a 7.72% return vs 0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MGMT or MOO?

MOO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MGMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MGMT or MOO?

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.30% for MGMT.

What is the main difference between MGMT and MOO?

MGMT is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: Inverdale Capital Management LLC and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for MGMT and 0.56% for MOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.