PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGMT vs. MOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MGMT vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MGMT vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MGMT
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF
2.39%6.96%12.95%17.87%-14.54%40.77%5.36%
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
16.24%15.61%-12.43%-8.57%-8.10%23.99%4.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGMT achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 16.24% return.


MGMT

1D
0.60%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
2.39%
6M
3.55%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
11.55%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*

MOO

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
16.24%
6M
18.78%
1Y
27.51%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
1.70%
10Y*
8.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MGMT vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGMT has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MGMT vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGMT
MGMT Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MGMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGMT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MGMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGMT vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGMTMOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

1.62

-0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

2.33

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.31

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.42

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.28

8.98

-4.70

MGMT vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the MOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGMT and MOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGMTMOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.62

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.10

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.24

+0.39

Correlation

The correlation between MGMT and MOO is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MGMT vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

MGMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than MOO's 2.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGMT
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF
0.33%0.34%0.51%1.16%0.90%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
2.12%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%

Drawdowns

MGMT vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGMT drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGMT and MOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MGMTMOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.95%

-69.53%

+44.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.60%

-11.13%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.95%

-39.52%

+14.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.27%

-12.90%

+3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-16.99%

+10.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

3.09%

+1.11%

Volatility

MGMT vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison

Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF (MGMT) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) have volatilities of 5.73% and 5.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MGMTMOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

5.47%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

10.81%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.88%

17.03%

+4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.55%

17.09%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

18.20%

+1.53%