MGKQX vs. GQFPX
MGKQX (Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio) and GQFPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, MGKQX returned 6.57%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for GQFPX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MGKQX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GQFPX.
Performance
MGKQX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGKQX achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 7.65% return.
MGKQX
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- -16.98%
- 1Y
- -10.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- —
GQFPX
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -3.67%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 7.70%
- 1Y
- 15.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MGKQX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGKQX Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio | 1.00% | 5.52% | 10.81% | 20.89% | -19.81% | 5.90% |
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund | 7.65% | 19.29% | 4.81% | 15.09% | -1.13% | 5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGKQX and GQFPX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGKQX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGKQX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank
MGKQX
GQFPX
MGKQX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGKQX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.27 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 2.79 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 7.90 | -8.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGKQX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 1.54 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.80 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
MGKQX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGKQX drawdown since its inception was -33.07%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGKQX and GQFPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGKQX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.07% | -16.95% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.97% | -5.24% | -20.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.97% | -10.57% | -15.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.78% | -4.95% | -14.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -3.01% | -5.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.80% | 1.85% | +11.95% |
Volatility
MGKQX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio (MGKQX) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.32%. This indicates that MGKQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGKQX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 3.32% | +3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.66% | 7.71% | +16.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.48% | 9.52% | +15.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 12.83% | +10.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 12.83% | +10.94% |
MGKQX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGKQX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGKQX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison
MGKQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund | 5.93% | 5.32% | 3.71% | 3.69% | 5.18% | 1.38% | 0.00% |
MGKQX Morgan Stanley Global Permanence Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.29% | 5.29% | 1.80% | 16.33% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGKQX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGKQX has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to GQFPX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGKQX dropped -33.07% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.
GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGKQX and GQFPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer