PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGINX vs. TOLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGINX vs. TOLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund (TOLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGINX achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than TOLIX's 8.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MGINX has underperformed TOLIX with an annualized return of 5.96%, while TOLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.64% annualized return.


MGINX

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.47%
YTD
4.06%
6M
4.69%
1Y
13.31%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
5.96%

TOLIX

1D
0.85%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
8.74%
6M
9.17%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
6.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGINX vs. TOLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
4.06%14.73%3.56%9.15%-6.87%6.36%2.26%12.61%0.33%13.65%
TOLIX
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund
8.74%12.73%11.98%1.93%-9.26%20.37%-1.90%29.21%-11.05%13.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MGINX and TOLIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2008

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between MGINX and TOLIX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGINX vs. TOLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGINX
MGINX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLIX
TOLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TOLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGINX vs. TOLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund (TOLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGINXTOLIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

0.90

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

1.33

+1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.16

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.61

+0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.15

4.28

+2.88

MGINX vs. TOLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the TOLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGINX and TOLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGINXTOLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.90

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.44

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.42

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.44

+0.03

Drawdowns

MGINX vs. TOLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGINX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than TOLIX's maximum drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGINX and TOLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGINXTOLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.39%

-42.68%

-20.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-6.05%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.01%

-14.51%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.16%

-25.01%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.12%

-35.19%

+20.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-4.91%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.76%

-7.12%

-6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.29%

-0.47%

Volatility

MGINX vs. TOLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) is 2.81%, while DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund (TOLIX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that MGINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TOLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGINXTOLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.59%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.33%

8.66%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.41%

10.88%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

14.18%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.47%

15.91%

-8.44%

MGINX vs. TOLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGINX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGINX vs. TOLIX - Dividend Comparison

MGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than TOLIX's 10.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
2.17%1.82%2.15%2.88%4.76%1.20%0.81%3.23%6.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TOLIX
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund
10.07%10.99%9.47%2.67%8.92%6.06%1.68%2.00%2.57%2.10%1.34%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGINX and TOLIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TOLIX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to MGINX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGINX dropped -63.39% vs TOLIX's -42.68%.

MGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGINX and TOLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer