PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGINX vs. QEVOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGINX vs. QEVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGINX achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than QEVOX's 53.48% return.


MGINX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.52%
YTD
3.62%
6M
4.33%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
8.38%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
5.92%

QEVOX

1D
-1.44%
1M
-6.52%
YTD
53.48%
6M
59.20%
1Y
76.37%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGINX vs. QEVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
3.62%14.73%3.56%9.15%-6.87%6.36%2.26%3.70%
QEVOX
Quantified Evolution Plus Fund
53.48%8.67%14.79%1.22%-24.02%14.49%-1.82%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MGINX and QEVOX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2019

0.40

The correlation between MGINX and QEVOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (5 years) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGINX vs. QEVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGINX
MGINX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QEVOX
QEVOX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QEVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QEVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGINX vs. QEVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGINXQEVOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.54

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

6.15

-4.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

23.66

-16.62

MGINX vs. QEVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the QEVOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGINX and QEVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGINXQEVOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

3.14

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.46

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.35

+0.12

Drawdowns

MGINX vs. QEVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGINX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than QEVOX's maximum drawdown of -28.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGINX and QEVOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGINXQEVOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.39%

-28.47%

-34.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-12.69%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.01%

-21.21%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.16%

-27.40%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-10.06%

+7.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.76%

-13.87%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

3.29%

-1.46%

Volatility

MGINX vs. QEVOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) is 2.69%, while Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that MGINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QEVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGINXQEVOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

6.09%

-3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

21.66%

-15.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.42%

24.87%

-17.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

20.01%

-13.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.47%

21.72%

-14.25%

MGINX vs. QEVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGINX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QEVOX's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGINX vs. QEVOX - Dividend Comparison

MGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than QEVOX's 43.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
2.18%1.82%2.15%2.88%4.76%1.20%0.81%3.23%6.82%
QEVOX
Quantified Evolution Plus Fund
43.22%66.34%10.32%24.53%0.07%13.55%2.29%0.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGINX and QEVOX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QEVOX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to MGINX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGINX dropped -63.39% vs QEVOX's -28.47%.

QEVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGINX and QEVOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer