PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGINX vs. KHYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGINX vs. KHYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and DWS High Income Fund (KHYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGINX achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than KHYAX's 1.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MGINX has outperformed KHYAX with an annualized return of 5.92%, while KHYAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.


MGINX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.52%
YTD
3.62%
6M
4.33%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
8.38%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
5.92%

KHYAX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.22%
6M
1.86%
1Y
6.87%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
5.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGINX vs. KHYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
3.62%14.73%3.56%9.15%-6.87%6.36%2.26%12.61%0.33%13.65%
KHYAX
DWS High Income Fund
1.22%7.54%7.02%11.44%-9.15%3.94%5.95%14.65%-2.46%7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MGINX and KHYAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 1995

0.35

Over the past year, MGINX and KHYAX have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGINX vs. KHYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGINX
MGINX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

KHYAX
KHYAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
KHYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
KHYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGINX vs. KHYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and DWS High Income Fund (KHYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGINXKHYAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.62

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.68

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

13.65

-6.61

MGINX vs. KHYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the KHYAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGINX and KHYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGINXKHYAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.51

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.77

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.89

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.04

-0.57

Drawdowns

MGINX vs. KHYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGINX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than KHYAX's maximum drawdown of -31.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGINX and KHYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGINXKHYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.39%

-31.54%

-31.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-2.68%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.01%

-4.49%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.16%

-13.22%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.12%

-22.42%

+7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-0.22%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.76%

-4.41%

-9.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.52%

+1.31%

Volatility

MGINX vs. KHYAX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to DWS High Income Fund (KHYAX) at 0.86%. This indicates that MGINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KHYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGINXKHYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

0.86%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

2.28%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.42%

2.87%

+4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

4.92%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.47%

5.88%

+1.59%

MGINX vs. KHYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGINX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KHYAX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGINX vs. KHYAX - Dividend Comparison

MGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than KHYAX's 6.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KHYAX
DWS High Income Fund
6.00%5.41%6.08%5.70%5.33%4.50%4.47%4.86%5.67%5.24%5.03%5.84%
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
2.18%1.82%2.15%2.88%4.76%1.20%0.81%3.23%6.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGINX and KHYAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGINX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to KHYAX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGINX dropped -63.39% vs KHYAX's -31.54%.

KHYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGINX and KHYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer