PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGINX vs. DESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGINX vs. DESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and DWS ESG Core Equity Fund (DESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGINX achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than DESGX's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MGINX has underperformed DESGX with an annualized return of 5.92%, while DESGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.


MGINX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.52%
YTD
3.62%
6M
4.33%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
8.38%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
5.92%

DESGX

1D
-0.85%
1M
4.85%
YTD
13.71%
6M
14.01%
1Y
36.47%
3Y*
23.11%
5Y*
14.99%
10Y*
13.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGINX vs. DESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
3.62%14.73%3.56%9.15%-6.87%6.36%2.26%12.61%0.33%13.65%
DESGX
DWS ESG Core Equity Fund
13.71%18.92%23.55%26.68%-15.56%28.99%19.13%28.18%-17.30%13.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MGINX and DESGX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2005

0.77

The correlation between MGINX and DESGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGINX vs. DESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGINX
MGINX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DESGX
DESGX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGINX vs. DESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and DWS ESG Core Equity Fund (DESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGINXDESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.52

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

3.92

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

18.10

-11.06

MGINX vs. DESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the DESGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGINX and DESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGINXDESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.89

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.88

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.73

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.53

-0.06

Drawdowns

MGINX vs. DESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGINX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than DESGX's maximum drawdown of -58.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGINX and DESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGINXDESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.39%

-58.26%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-9.38%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.01%

-21.26%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.16%

-22.01%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.12%

-34.68%

+19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-0.88%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.76%

-8.11%

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.03%

-0.20%

Volatility

MGINX vs. DESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) is 2.69%, while DWS ESG Core Equity Fund (DESGX) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that MGINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGINXDESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

3.73%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

9.82%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.42%

12.75%

-5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

17.18%

-10.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.47%

18.23%

-10.76%

MGINX vs. DESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGINX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DESGX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGINX vs. DESGX - Dividend Comparison

MGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than DESGX's 5.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DESGX
DWS ESG Core Equity Fund
5.07%5.76%7.94%2.80%4.21%12.80%4.06%7.61%21.12%3.53%6.49%7.25%
MGINX
DWS Global Macro Fund
2.18%1.82%2.15%2.88%4.76%1.20%0.81%3.23%6.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGINX and DESGX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DESGX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to MGINX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGINX dropped -63.39% vs DESGX's -58.26%.

DESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGINX and DESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer