MGIFX vs. CSUIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MGIFX (Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund) and CSUIX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MGIFX returned 9.27%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for CSUIX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGIFX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CSUIX.

Performance

MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (MGIFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGIFX achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 9.60% return.

MGIFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 13.34%
• 6M: 14.25%
• 1Y: 23.15%
• 3Y*: 13.63%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: —

CSUIX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: -2.21%
• YTD: 9.60%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 16.57%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 7.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MGIFX Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	13.34%	28.20%	-0.47%	7.88%	-3.61%	11.74%	-0.69%	31.06%
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.	9.60%	14.69%	8.74%	2.46%	-4.89%	16.60%	-1.29%	24.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MGIFX and CSUIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2019	0.84

The correlation between MGIFX and CSUIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MGIFX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGIFX

MGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 68
MGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
MGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

CSUIX

CSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 42
CSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (MGIFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MGIFX	CSUIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	1.74	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.52	+0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.31	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	2.83	+0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.98	9.50	+3.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the CSUIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGIFX and CSUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MGIFX	CSUIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	1.74	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.55	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.57	+0.13

Drawdowns

MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGIFX drawdown since its inception was -36.75%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGIFX and CSUIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGIFX	CSUIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.75%	-52.01%	+15.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.78%	-5.96%	-1.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.62%	-14.89%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.41%	-20.01%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.22%	-3.34%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-8.16%	+2.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.77%	+0.24%

Volatility

MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison

Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (MGIFX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.11%. This indicates that MGIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGIFX	CSUIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	3.11%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.49%	7.81%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	9.68%	+1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.20%	12.97%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.87%	14.90%	+0.97%

MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGIFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison

MGIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.24%, more than CSUIX's 7.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.	7.67%	8.41%	2.58%	2.53%	3.91%	3.25%	1.64%	1.83%	2.45%	5.12%	2.35%	6.52%
MGIFX Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund	49.24%	7.56%	3.17%	5.41%	8.60%	7.13%	6.18%	6.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGIFX and CSUIX in my portfolio?

MGIFX and CSUIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGIFX or CSUIX?

MGIFX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to CSUIX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGIFX dropped -36.75% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.