MGIFX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (MGIFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
MGIFX is managed by Mondrian. It was launched on Dec 16, 2018. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGIFX Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 7.88% | 28.20% | -0.47% | 7.88% | -3.61% | 11.74% | -0.69% | 31.06% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGIFX achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 8.44% return.
MGIFX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 28.28%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- —
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGIFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGIFX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
MGIFX
CSUIX
MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (MGIFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 1.67 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | 2.21 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.33 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 2.42 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.61 | 10.58 | +3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.67 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.64 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.58 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGIFX and CSUIX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
MGIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, less than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGIFX Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 7.00% | 7.56% | 3.17% | 5.41% | 8.60% | 7.13% | 6.18% | 6.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGIFX drawdown since its inception was -36.75%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGIFX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.75% | -52.01% | +15.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -7.99% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.41% | -20.01% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.34% | -4.36% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -8.21% | +2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 1.82% | +0.29% |
Volatility
MGIFX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Mondrian Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (MGIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that MGIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGIFX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 3.24% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.59% | 6.90% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 11.49% | +0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.10% | 12.86% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 14.88% | +1.03% |