MGHAX vs. MHCAX
MGHAX (MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund) and MHCAX (MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - MGHAX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by New York Life, while MHCAX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by New York Life. Over the past 10 years, MGHAX returned 6.51%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for MHCAX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGHAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MHCAX.
Performance
MGHAX vs. MHCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGHAX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than MHCAX's 1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MGHAX has underperformed MHCAX with an annualized return of 6.51%, while MHCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.81% annualized return.
MGHAX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.51%
MHCAX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
MGHAX vs. MHCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGHAX MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund | 1.77% | 13.27% | 6.74% | 13.27% | 9.23% | -4.88% | 2.97% | 15.49% | -6.88% | 11.33% |
MHCAX MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A | 1.20% | 6.44% | 6.90% | 11.27% | 42.57% | 5.10% | 4.82% | 12.76% | -1.92% | 6.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGHAX and MHCAX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1998 | 0.47 |
The correlation between MGHAX and MHCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGHAX vs. MHCAX — Risk / Return Rank
MGHAX
MHCAX
MGHAX vs. MHCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) and MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGHAX | MHCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.62 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 3.31 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 15.72 | -4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGHAX | MHCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.44 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.53 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.54 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.78 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
MGHAX vs. MHCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGHAX drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, which is greater than MHCAX's maximum drawdown of -29.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGHAX and MHCAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGHAX | MHCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.23% | -29.62% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.70% | -1.67% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.87% | -3.34% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.50% | -11.74% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.61% | -18.98% | -10.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.19% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -2.14% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 0.35% | +0.82% |
Volatility
MGHAX vs. MHCAX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX) at 0.80%. This indicates that MGHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MHCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGHAX | MHCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 0.80% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.86% | 1.73% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69% | 2.28% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 25.35% | -9.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 18.23% | -5.71% |
MGHAX vs. MHCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGHAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MHCAX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGHAX vs. MHCAX - Dividend Comparison
MGHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than MHCAX's 5.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGHAX MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund | 6.41% | 6.49% | 7.62% | 5.95% | 31.14% | 5.06% | 5.54% | 4.24% | 4.96% | 4.18% | 5.29% | 6.11% |
MHCAX MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A | 5.99% | 6.06% | 5.90% | 5.56% | 40.91% | 5.00% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 5.94% | 6.20% | 5.69% | 6.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGHAX and MHCAX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGHAX has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to MHCAX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGHAX dropped -33.23% vs MHCAX's -29.62%.
MGHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGHAX and MHCAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer