MGGPX vs. CAEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX).
MGGPX is a passively managed fund by Morgan Stanley that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on May 24, 2010. CAEIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
MGGPX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGGPX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A | -14.99% | 0.77% | 27.16% | 49.29% | -41.77% | -0.05% | 55.05% | 35.03% | -5.96% | 49.03% |
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 4.22% | 32.61% | -7.13% | 5.67% | -17.43% | 6.73% | 61.52% | 33.48% | -19.26% | 29.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGGPX achieves a -14.99% return, which is significantly lower than CAEIX's 4.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MGGPX has outperformed CAEIX with an annualized return of 11.19%, while CAEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.
MGGPX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- -14.99%
- 6M
- -26.48%
- 1Y
- -13.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
CAEIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -7.32%
- YTD
- 4.22%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 41.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGGPX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGGPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGGPX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank
MGGPX
CAEIX
MGGPX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGGPX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | 2.20 | -2.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | 2.90 | -3.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.40 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 3.39 | -3.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 14.41 | -15.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGGPX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 2.20 | -2.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.18 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.51 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.03 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGGPX and CAEIX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGGPX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison
MGGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.95% | 2.27% | 24.31% | 5.14% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 0.40% | 7.23% | 1.29% |
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 0.69% | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.07% | 0.86% | 0.49% | 0.82% | 1.23% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.79% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
MGGPX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGGPX drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGGPX and CAEIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGGPX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.83% | -75.81% | +23.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.32% | -11.07% | -17.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.14% | -32.58% | -18.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.83% | -37.54% | -14.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.22% | -13.12% | -15.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -49.06% | +39.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.55% | 2.62% | +7.93% |
Volatility
MGGPX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) at 6.88%. This indicates that MGGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGGPX | CAEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 6.88% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.41% | 12.14% | +6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.89% | 18.28% | +6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 19.08% | +6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 19.61% | +3.31% |