MGGPX vs. MOAT

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MGGPX (Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both funds - MGGPX is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGGPX returned 12.37%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for MOAT. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MGGPX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.

Performance

MGGPX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGGPX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's 7.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MGGPX has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 12.37%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.78% annualized return.

MGGPX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -2.29%
• 6M: 4.19%
• YTD: 1.62%
• 1Y: -9.41%
• 3Y*: 12.80%
• 5Y*: 1.78%
• 10Y*: 12.37%
• ALL TIME*: 14.03%

MOAT

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 4.62%
• 6M: 7.51%
• YTD: 7.38%
• 1Y: 16.22%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: 9.28%
• 10Y*: 13.78%
• ALL TIME*: 14.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	$62.48M	$66.16M	$79.13M

MGGPX vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A	1.62%	0.77%	27.16%	49.29%	-41.77%	-0.05%	55.05%	35.03%	-5.96%	49.03%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	7.38%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MGGPX and MOAT is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012	0.69

The correlation between MGGPX and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MGGPX vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGGPX

MGGPX Risk / Return Rank: 2
MGGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MGGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MGGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MGGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MGGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 38
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGGPX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGGPX	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	1.16	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	1.73	-2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.20	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	1.31	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.57	3.91	-4.48

MGGPX vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGGPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGGPX and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGGPX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGGPX drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGGPX and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGGPX	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.83%	-33.31%	-18.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.32%	-12.43%	-15.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.32%	-21.44%	-6.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.14%	-23.96%	-27.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.83%	-33.31%	-18.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.20%	0.00%	-14.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.49%	-3.82%	-5.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.94%	4.16%	+9.78%

Volatility

MGGPX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A (MGGPX) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.28%. This indicates that MGGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGGPX	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	4.28%	+2.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.89%	10.65%	+8.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.60%	14.06%	+10.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.56%	18.31%	+8.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.30%	18.63%	+4.67%

MGGPX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGGPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGGPX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

MGGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGGPX Morgan Stanley Global Opportunity Portfolio Class A	0.00%	0.00%	9.95%	2.27%	24.31%	5.14%	1.20%	0.00%	0.82%	0.40%	7.23%	1.29%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.26%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGGPX and MOAT in my portfolio?

MGGPX and MOAT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGGPX or MOAT?

MGGPX has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to MOAT (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGGPX dropped -51.83% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.