PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGGIX vs. DBLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGGIX vs. DBLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio (MGGIX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGGIX achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly higher than DBLSX's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MGGIX has outperformed DBLSX with an annualized return of 13.54%, while DBLSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.87% annualized return.


MGGIX

1D
-0.61%
1M
8.65%
YTD
4.95%
6M
-4.55%
1Y
-4.53%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
13.54%

DBLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
2.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGGIX vs. DBLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGGIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio
4.95%1.86%27.50%49.70%-41.57%0.22%55.49%35.44%-5.65%49.45%
DBLSX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund
1.06%5.74%5.32%6.76%-2.69%0.70%2.02%4.73%1.40%2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MGGIX and DBLSX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2011

0.07

The correlation between MGGIX and DBLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGGIX vs. DBLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGGIX
MGGIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MGGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MGGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLSX
DBLSX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DBLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGGIX vs. DBLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio (MGGIX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGGIXDBLSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

3.76

-3.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.15

6.30

-6.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

2.06

-1.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

6.27

-6.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.38

28.69

-29.07

MGGIX vs. DBLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGGIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the DBLSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGGIX and DBLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGGIXDBLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

3.76

-3.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

2.28

-2.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.04

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.05

+0.48

Drawdowns

MGGIX vs. DBLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGGIX drawdown since its inception was -59.08%, roughly equal to the maximum DBLSX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGGIX and DBLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGGIXDBLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.08%

-57.22%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.65%

-0.72%

-26.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.65%

-0.72%

-26.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.02%

-4.71%

-46.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.60%

-57.22%

+5.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.61%

-45.00%

+34.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-31.51%

+20.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.36%

0.16%

+12.20%

Volatility

MGGIX vs. DBLSX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio (MGGIX) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) at 0.42%. This indicates that MGGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGGIXDBLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

0.42%

+5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.04%

0.89%

+18.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

1.20%

+20.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

1.39%

+24.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.05%

63.99%

-40.94%

MGGIX vs. DBLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGGIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLSX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGGIX vs. DBLSX - Dividend Comparison

MGGIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLSX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund
4.55%4.64%5.09%4.49%2.50%1.72%2.37%3.21%2.92%2.42%2.52%2.47%
MGGIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%9.27%2.13%22.94%4.92%1.16%0.00%0.79%0.39%7.04%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGGIX and DBLSX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGGIX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to DBLSX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGGIX dropped -59.08% vs DBLSX's -57.22%.

DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGGIX and DBLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer