MGFIX vs. YACKX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX).
MGFIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jun 1, 1984. YACKX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jul 6, 1992.
Performance
MGFIX vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGFIX vs. YACKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGFIX AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund | -1.16% | 7.26% | 1.50% | 6.69% | -13.17% | -9.68% | 7.34% | 11.11% | -1.82% | 6.78% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 4.19% | 1.34% | 13.15% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 27.49% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGFIX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MGFIX has underperformed YACKX with an annualized return of 1.41%, while YACKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.21% annualized return.
MGFIX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 3.44%
- 3Y*
- 3.54%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.41%
YACKX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGFIX vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGFIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGFIX vs. YACKX — Risk / Return Rank
MGFIX
YACKX
MGFIX vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGFIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.20 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 0.35 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 0.18 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 0.55 | +3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGFIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.20 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.41 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.70 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.68 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGFIX and YACKX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MGFIX vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison
MGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, while YACKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGFIX AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund | 3.66% | 3.85% | 3.56% | 2.94% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 3.38% | 4.20% | 3.89% | 3.81% | 4.96% | 4.17% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.32% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 16.84% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
Drawdowns
MGFIX vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGFIX drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum YACKX drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGFIX and YACKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGFIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -46.65% | +21.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.27% | -16.30% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.68% | -19.86% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.03% | -30.93% | +5.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.96% | -10.67% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -5.28% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 5.46% | -4.57% |
Volatility
MGFIX vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) is 1.65%, while AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that MGFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGFIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 4.89% | -3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 19.24% | -16.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 21.08% | -16.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 17.02% | -11.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 16.09% | -10.86% |