PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGDIX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGDIX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Growth Allocation Fund (MGDIX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGDIX achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than FRGAX's 9.37% return.


MGDIX

1D
0.28%
1M
4.38%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.82%
1Y
21.89%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
8.66%

FRGAX

1D
0.22%
1M
4.20%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.79%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGDIX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MGDIX
MainStay Growth Allocation Fund
10.42%12.70%9.98%14.52%-2.31%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
9.37%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MGDIX and FRGAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.96

The correlation between MGDIX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGDIX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGDIX
MGDIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MGDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MGDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGDIX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Growth Allocation Fund (MGDIX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGDIXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.48

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.27

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

14.61

-1.93

MGDIX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGDIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGDIX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGDIXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.55

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

1.54

-1.05

Drawdowns

MGDIX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGDIX drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGDIX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGDIXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-11.77%

-34.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-7.03%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-11.77%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-1.58%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.57%

+0.20%

Volatility

MGDIX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Growth Allocation Fund (MGDIX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGDIXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.75%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

7.19%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

9.03%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

10.31%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.11%

10.31%

+3.80%

MGDIX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGDIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGDIX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

MGDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than FRGAX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.83%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGDIX
MainStay Growth Allocation Fund
4.63%5.11%8.27%0.14%7.62%11.17%5.44%4.58%11.08%2.83%2.25%5.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MGDIX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGDIX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to FRGAX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGDIX dropped -46.05% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGDIX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer