PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGBLX vs. MITTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGBLX vs. MITTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGBLX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than MITTX's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MGBLX has underperformed MITTX with an annualized return of 1.53%, while MITTX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


MGBLX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.15%
YTD
0.68%
6M
1.22%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
1.53%

MITTX

1D
0.95%
1M
0.76%
YTD
7.77%
6M
7.46%
1Y
20.45%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGBLX vs. MITTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGBLX
MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2
0.68%5.38%1.81%7.69%-11.57%-3.48%10.52%7.91%-2.66%7.22%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
7.77%13.67%19.69%19.26%-16.27%26.73%18.72%31.92%-5.56%23.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MGBLX and MITTX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010

0.10

Over the past year, MGBLX and MITTX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGBLX vs. MITTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGBLX
MGBLX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MGBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MGBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MITTX
MITTX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MITTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MITTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MITTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MITTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MITTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGBLX vs. MITTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGBLXMITTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.07

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.64

8.88

-5.24

MGBLX vs. MITTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGBLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the MITTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGBLX and MITTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGBLX vs. MITTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGBLX drawdown since its inception was -18.71%, smaller than the maximum MITTX drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGBLX and MITTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGBLXMITTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.71%

-49.54%

+30.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-9.76%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.74%

-16.10%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.10%

-23.27%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.71%

-33.45%

+14.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.39%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-10.53%

+3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

2.27%

-1.16%

Volatility

MGBLX vs. MITTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) is 0.98%, while MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust (MITTX) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that MGBLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MITTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGBLXMITTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

4.29%

-3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

9.34%

-6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41%

11.72%

-8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.30%

15.77%

-11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

17.24%

-12.59%

MGBLX vs. MITTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGBLX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MITTX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGBLX vs. MITTX - Dividend Comparison

MGBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than MITTX's 13.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGBLX
MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2
4.24%4.01%2.53%1.55%2.99%4.72%3.15%1.81%1.66%1.08%1.15%1.63%
MITTX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust
13.29%14.33%14.47%10.96%9.35%8.66%8.14%7.58%13.49%7.27%5.55%6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGBLX and MITTX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MITTX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to MGBLX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGBLX dropped -18.71% vs MITTX's -49.54%.

MITTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGBLX and MITTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer