PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGBJX vs. DFSHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGBJX vs. DFSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund (MGBJX) and DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGBJX achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than DFSHX's 1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MGBJX has underperformed DFSHX with an annualized return of 1.76%, while DFSHX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.99% annualized return.


MGBJX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.35%
6M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.42%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
1.76%
ALL TIME*
1.84%

DFSHX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.11%
6M
0.97%
YTD
1.62%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
1.99%
ALL TIME*
1.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MGBJX vs. DFSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGBJX
MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund
-0.42%5.91%2.45%8.19%-11.31%-2.97%10.92%8.56%-2.04%7.78%
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.62%4.84%5.66%5.55%-6.24%-0.82%2.33%4.82%1.83%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MGBJX and DFSHX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.56

The correlation between MGBJX and DFSHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGBJX vs. DFSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGBJX
MGBJX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MGBJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGBJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGBJX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MGBJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGBJX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSHX
DFSHX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DFSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGBJX vs. DFSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund (MGBJX) and DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGBJXDFSHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.52

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.75

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

10.65

-8.32

MGBJX vs. DFSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGBJX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the DFSHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGBJX and DFSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGBJX vs. DFSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGBJX drawdown since its inception was -17.96%, which is greater than DFSHX's maximum drawdown of -9.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGBJX and DFSHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGBJXDFSHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.96%

-9.58%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-1.28%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.65%

-4.18%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-9.58%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.96%

-9.58%

-8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-0.11%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-2.27%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.33%

+0.82%

Volatility

MGBJX vs. DFSHX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund (MGBJX) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) at 0.58%. This indicates that MGBJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGBJXDFSHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.58%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

1.50%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

1.65%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

3.38%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

2.64%

+2.00%

MGBJX vs. DFSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGBJX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSHX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGBJX vs. DFSHX - Dividend Comparison

MGBJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than DFSHX's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.19%4.26%4.50%3.90%0.04%1.77%0.03%2.52%3.23%1.75%1.63%1.11%
MGBJX
MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund
4.53%4.50%3.03%1.99%3.42%5.25%3.61%2.29%2.19%1.59%1.68%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGBJX and DFSHX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGBJX has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to DFSHX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGBJX dropped -17.96% vs DFSHX's -9.58%.

DFSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGBJX and DFSHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer