MGA vs. O
MGA (Magna International Inc.) and O (Realty Income Corporation) are both stocks. MGA operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while O operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, MGA returned 8.67%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for O. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MGA vs. O - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGA achieves a 29.87% return, which is significantly higher than O's 8.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MGA has outperformed O with an annualized return of 8.67%, while O has yielded a comparatively lower 4.58% annualized return.
MGA
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 29.87%
- 6M
- 39.84%
- 1Y
- 94.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- -4.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
O
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 5.55%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- 5.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.47%
- 10Y*
- 4.58%
MGA vs. O - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGA Magna International Inc. | 29.87% | 33.72% | -26.29% | 8.76% | -28.04% | 16.57% | 33.41% | 24.30% | -18.40% | 33.69% |
O Realty Income Corporation | 8.26% | 12.20% | -2.11% | -4.55% | -7.38% | 23.95% | -11.60% | 21.27% | 15.94% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGA and O is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 1994 | 0.25 |
The correlation between MGA and O shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MGA:
$2.39
O:
$1.17
MGA:
28.50
O:
50.86
MGA:
7.00
O:
4.14
MGA:
0.45
O:
6.87
MGA:
$42.34B
O:
$5.92B
MGA:
$5.32B
O:
$3.89B
MGA:
$4.08B
O:
$3.93B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGA vs. O — Risk / Return Rank
MGA
O
MGA vs. O - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Magna International Inc. (MGA) and Realty Income Corporation (O). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGA | O | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.14 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 1.14 | +2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.19 | 2.88 | +9.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGA | O | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 0.79 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.13 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.18 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.48 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
MGA vs. O - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGA drawdown since its inception was -79.01%, which is greater than O's maximum drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGA and O.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGA | O | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.01% | -48.45% | -30.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.47% | -11.10% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.57% | -26.49% | -22.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.02% | -34.48% | -31.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.02% | -48.28% | -17.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.04% | -10.44% | -10.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.41% | -9.21% | -12.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.78% | 4.37% | +3.41% |
Volatility
MGA vs. O - Volatility Comparison
Magna International Inc. (MGA) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to Realty Income Corporation (O) at 5.48%. This indicates that MGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than O based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGA | O | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.11% | 5.48% | +4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.09% | 11.72% | +16.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.18% | 15.95% | +19.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.64% | 18.87% | +16.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.45% | 25.63% | +9.82% |
Dividends
MGA vs. O - Dividend Comparison
MGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than O's 5.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGA Magna International Inc. | 2.88% | 3.64% | 4.55% | 3.11% | 4.23% | 2.13% | 2.26% | 2.66% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.30% | 1.90% |
O Realty Income Corporation | 5.42% | 6.19% | 5.37% | 5.33% | 4.68% | 3.87% | 4.51% | 3.69% | 4.19% | 4.45% | 4.18% | 4.41% |
Financials
MGA vs. O - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Magna International Inc. and Realty Income Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MGA vs. O - Profitability Comparison
MGA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magna International Inc. reported a gross profit of 987.13M and revenue of 10.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.
O - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MGA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magna International Inc. reported an operating income of 437.85M and revenue of 10.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
O - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
MGA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magna International Inc. reported a net income of -11.83M and revenue of 10.24B, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.
O - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Realty Income Corporation reported a net income of -9.17M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of -0.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MGA and O have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGA has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to O (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGA dropped -79.01% vs O's -48.45%.
MGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGA and O
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer