MFSV vs. IBTF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFSV (MFS Active Value ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. MFSV is actively managed, while IBTF is passively managed. Over the past year, MFSV returned 12.83% vs 2.14% for IBTF. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. MFSV charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.

Performance

MFSV vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MFSV

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 4.53%
• 6M: 5.79%
• 1Y: 12.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 2.14%
• 3Y*: 3.66%
• 5Y*: 0.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFSV vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MFSV MFS Active Value ETF	4.53%	13.63%	-4.64%
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	3.81%	0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MFSV and IBTF is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024	-0.01

Return for Risk

MFSV vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSV

MFSV Risk / Return Rank: 38
MFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
MFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
MFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 44

IBTF

IBTF Risk / Return Rank: 99
IBTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBTF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
IBTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
IBTF Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSV vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFSV	IBTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	7.08	-5.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	20.07	-18.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	6.23	-5.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	59.41	-57.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	269.70	-262.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFSV vs. IBTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the IBTF Sharpe Ratio of 7.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSV and IBTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFSV	IBTF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	7.08	-5.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.44	+0.20

Drawdowns

MFSV vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSV drawdown since its inception was -12.74%, which is greater than IBTF's maximum drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSV and IBTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFSV	IBTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.74%	-10.45%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.34%	-0.04%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	0.00%	-1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-3.33%	+1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	0.01%	+1.84%

Volatility

MFSV vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison

MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) at 0.00%. This indicates that MFSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFSV	IBTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.30%	0.00%	+2.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.59%	0.19%	+7.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.21%	0.36%	+9.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	2.38%	+11.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.73%	2.56%	+11.17%

MFSV vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSV has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFSV vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison

MFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than IBTF's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF	2.08%	3.83%	4.32%	4.03%	1.93%	0.57%	0.59%
MFSV MFS Active Value ETF	1.51%	1.53%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFSV and IBTF in my portfolio?

MFSV and IBTF have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFSV or IBTF?

MFSV has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to IBTF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSV dropped -12.74% vs IBTF's -10.45%.

Which ETF is better, MFSV or IBTF?

On 1-year performance, MFSV leads with 12.83% vs 2.14% for IBTF. On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MFSV or IBTF?

Over the 1-year period, MFSV has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFSV or IBTF?

IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for MFSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFSV or IBTF?

IBTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.51% for MFSV.

What is the main difference between MFSV and IBTF?

MFSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IBTF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: MFS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for MFSV and 0.07% for IBTF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.08 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.