MFSM vs. BRSM
MFSM (MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF) and BRSM (MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFSM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by MFS, while BRSM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by MFS. Both are actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MFSM charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for BRSM.
Performance
MFSM vs. BRSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MFSM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.80%
BRSM
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.85K | $221.25K | $782.10K | |
| $434.35K | $408.74K | $440.79K |
MFSM vs. BRSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MFSM MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF | -1.12% |
BRSM MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF | 1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFSM and BRSM is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFSM vs. BRSM — Risk / Return Rank
MFSM
BRSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MFSM vs. BRSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF (MFSM) and MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF (BRSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFSM | BRSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFSM vs. BRSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFSM drawdown since its inception was -3.86%, which is greater than BRSM's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSM and BRSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFSM | BRSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -3.25% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -2.57% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -1.40% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility
MFSM vs. BRSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFSM | BRSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70% | 16.88% | -14.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 16.88% | -13.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 16.88% | -13.50% |
MFSM vs. BRSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFSM has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than BRSM's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFSM vs. BRSM - Dividend Comparison
MFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, while BRSM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BRSM MFS Blended Research Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFSM MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF | 3.62% | 3.53% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFSM and BRSM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFSM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFSM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for BRSM.
MFSM has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 0.00% for BRSM.
MFSM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BRSM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for MFSM and 0.38% for BRSM.
Find the right allocation for MFSM and BRSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer