PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFSB vs. MMID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFSB vs. MMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF (MFSB) and MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSB achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than MMID's 7.65% return.


MFSB

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.14%
6M
-0.30%
YTD
-0.02%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.59%

MMID

1D
0.03%
1M
1.23%
6M
4.97%
YTD
7.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.99M$4.23M$3.08M
$6.57K$9.23K$17.42K

MFSB vs. MMID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MFSB
MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF
-0.02%1.01%
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
7.65%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MFSB and MMID is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFSB vs. MMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFSB
MFSB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MFSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MMID

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFSB vs. MMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF (MFSB) and MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFSBMMIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.51

MFSB vs. MMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFSB vs. MMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSB drawdown since its inception was -3.19%, smaller than the maximum MMID drawdown of -7.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSB and MMID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFSBMMIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-7.93%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.77%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-1.89%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

Volatility

MFSB vs. MMID - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFSBMMIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

13.16%

-9.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.16%

13.16%

-9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.16%

13.16%

-9.00%

MFSB vs. MMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSB has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than MMID's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFSB vs. MMID - Dividend Comparison

MFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than MMID's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MFSB
MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF
4.64%4.58%0.37%
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
0.69%0.28%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFSB and MMID have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFSB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFSB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MMID.

MFSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.69% for MMID.

MFSB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while MMID is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for MFSB and 0.59% for MMID.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFSB and MMID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer