MFSB vs. MMID
MFSB (MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF) and MMID (MFS Active Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFSB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by MFS, while MMID is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by MFS. Both are actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MFSB charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MMID.
Performance
MFSB vs. MMID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFSB achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than MMID's 7.65% return.
MFSB
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.59%
MMID
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.99M | $4.23M | $3.08M | |
| $6.57K | $9.23K | $17.42K |
MFSB vs. MMID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFSB MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.02% | 1.01% |
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 7.65% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFSB and MMID is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFSB vs. MMID — Risk / Return Rank
MFSB
MMID
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MFSB vs. MMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF (MFSB) and MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFSB | MMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFSB vs. MMID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFSB drawdown since its inception was -3.19%, smaller than the maximum MMID drawdown of -7.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSB and MMID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFSB | MMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -7.93% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.77% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -1.89% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | — | — |
Volatility
MFSB vs. MMID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFSB | MMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48% | 13.16% | -9.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 13.16% | -9.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 13.16% | -9.00% |
MFSB vs. MMID - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFSB has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than MMID's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFSB vs. MMID - Dividend Comparison
MFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than MMID's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MFSB MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.64% | 4.58% | 0.37% |
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 0.69% | 0.28% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFSB and MMID have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFSB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFSB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MMID.
MFSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.69% for MMID.
MFSB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while MMID is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for MFSB and 0.59% for MMID.
Find the right allocation for MFSB and MMID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer