MFLX vs. THYM
MFLX (First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF) and THYM (T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFLX is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while THYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFLX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for THYM.
Performance
MFLX vs. THYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with MFLX at 3.33% and THYM at 3.33%.
MFLX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- —
THYM
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFLX vs. THYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFLX First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF | 3.33% | 0.27% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 3.33% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFLX and THYM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFLX vs. THYM — Risk / Return Rank
MFLX
THYM
MFLX vs. THYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) and T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFLX | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFLX | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 1.62 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
MFLX vs. THYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFLX drawdown since its inception was -26.76%, which is greater than THYM's maximum drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFLX and THYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFLX | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.76% | -2.93% | -23.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | 0.00% | -3.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -0.49% | -7.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | — | — |
Volatility
MFLX vs. THYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFLX | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08% | 4.35% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 4.35% | +6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.29% | 4.35% | +6.94% |
MFLX vs. THYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFLX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than THYM's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFLX vs. THYM - Dividend Comparison
MFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than THYM's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFLX First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF | 4.08% | 4.06% | 3.81% | 3.65% | 4.27% | 3.69% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 3.74% | 3.80% | 0.98% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 2.18% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFLX and THYM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, THYM is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THYM is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for MFLX.
MFLX has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 2.18% for THYM.
MFLX is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while THYM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for MFLX and 0.32% for THYM.
Find the right allocation for MFLX and THYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer