MFLX vs. RVNU
MFLX (First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF) and RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MFLX is actively managed, while RVNU is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFLX returned -0.03%/yr vs -0.23%/yr for RVNU. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFLX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for RVNU.
Performance
MFLX vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFLX achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 3.71% return.
MFLX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- —
RVNU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
MFLX vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFLX First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF | 3.33% | 3.94% | 3.74% | 8.98% | -19.94% | 8.43% | 7.19% | 16.89% | -4.66% | 5.57% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.71% | 0.58% | 1.46% | 11.19% | -16.60% | 2.28% | 6.54% | 10.16% | -0.56% | 8.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFLX and RVNU is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2016 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, MFLX and RVNU have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFLX vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank
MFLX
RVNU
MFLX vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFLX | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.36 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.92 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | 11.69 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFLX | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.89 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | -0.03 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.39 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
MFLX vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFLX drawdown since its inception was -26.76%, which is greater than RVNU's maximum drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFLX and RVNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFLX | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.76% | -23.51% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | -2.46% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.18% | -10.35% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.88% | -23.51% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -2.80% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -4.98% | -3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.83% | -0.06% |
Volatility
MFLX vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFLX | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.42% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.98% | 3.41% | -0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08% | 5.12% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 7.19% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.29% | 7.27% | +4.02% |
MFLX vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFLX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFLX vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison
MFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than RVNU's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFLX First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF | 4.08% | 4.06% | 3.81% | 3.65% | 4.27% | 3.69% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 3.74% | 3.80% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.52% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFLX and RVNU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RVNU has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to MFLX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFLX dropped -26.76% vs RVNU's -23.51%.
On 5-year performance, MFLX leads with -0.03% vs -0.23% for RVNU. On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFLX has performed better with a -0.03% return vs -0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for MFLX.
MFLX has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 3.52% for RVNU.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for MFLX and 0.15% for RVNU.
MFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFLX and RVNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer