MFHVX vs. PRFRX
MFHVX (MetLife Opportunistic High Yield Fund) and PRFRX (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, MFHVX returned 4.12%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for PRFRX. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MFHVX charges 1.43%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRFRX.
Performance
MFHVX vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFHVX achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly higher than PRFRX's 1.84% return.
MFHVX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 5.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.87%
PRFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MFHVX vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFHVX MetLife Opportunistic High Yield Fund | 4.04% | 4.56% | 9.72% | 14.09% | -12.06% | 10.53% | 6.88% | 12.81% | -3.06% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class | 1.84% | 7.78% | 16.63% | 20.66% | -1.95% | 4.60% | 1.75% | 8.46% | -2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFHVX and PRFRX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018 | 0.49 |
The correlation between MFHVX and PRFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFHVX vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank
MFHVX
PRFRX
MFHVX vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife Opportunistic High Yield Fund (MFHVX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFHVX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.63 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.02 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.84 | 10.89 | -5.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFHVX vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFHVX drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, roughly equal to the maximum PRFRX drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFHVX and PRFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFHVX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.95% | -20.05% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.43% | -1.50% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.14% | -2.07% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.54% | -5.94% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.22% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -0.68% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.42% | +0.53% |
Volatility
MFHVX vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison
MetLife Opportunistic High Yield Fund (MFHVX) has a higher volatility of 0.50% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class (PRFRX) at 0.30%. This indicates that MFHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFHVX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | 0.30% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.02% | 1.78% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73% | 2.44% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.46% | 3.15% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 4.00% | +0.38% |
MFHVX vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFHVX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than PRFRX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFHVX vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison
MFHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than PRFRX's 6.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFHVX MetLife Opportunistic High Yield Fund | 9.11% | 9.41% | 8.98% | 9.66% | 8.95% | 8.44% | 7.30% | 8.61% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class | 6.76% | 8.11% | 15.09% | 15.33% | 4.03% | 3.86% | 4.00% | 4.84% | 4.87% | 4.04% | 4.07% | 4.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFHVX and PRFRX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFHVX has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to PRFRX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFHVX dropped -20.95% vs PRFRX's -20.05%.
MFHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFHVX and PRFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer