MFHQX vs. SMTRX
MFHQX (BlackRock Total Return Fund) and SMTRX (ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFHQX charges 1.45%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for SMTRX.
Performance
MFHQX vs. SMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MFHQX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 4.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.97%
SMTRX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFHQX vs. SMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MFHQX BlackRock Total Return Fund | 0.09% |
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFHQX and SMTRX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFHQX vs. SMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
MFHQX
SMTRX
MFHQX vs. SMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Total Return Fund (MFHQX) and ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund (SMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFHQX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFHQX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -2.96 | +3.37 |
Drawdowns
MFHQX vs. SMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFHQX drawdown since its inception was -20.45%, which is greater than SMTRX's maximum drawdown of -0.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFHQX and SMTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFHQX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.45% | -0.21% | -20.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.28% | -0.21% | -6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -0.08% | -4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | — | — |
Volatility
MFHQX vs. SMTRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFHQX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.57% | 2.47% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.25% | 2.47% | +3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 2.47% | +2.63% |
MFHQX vs. SMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFHQX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SMTRX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFHQX vs. SMTRX - Dividend Comparison
MFHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than SMTRX's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFHQX BlackRock Total Return Fund | 3.71% | 3.83% | 3.28% | 2.85% | 1.95% | 1.50% | 5.22% | 2.20% | 2.33% | 1.99% | 1.82% | 2.40% |
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, MFHQX and SMTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for MFHQX and SMTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer