PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MFHQX vs. WFBIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MFHQX and WFBIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

MFHQX vs. WFBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Total Return Fund (MFHQX) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.97%
-1.36%
MFHQX
WFBIX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MFHQX:

0.53

WFBIX:

0.75

Sortino Ratio

MFHQX:

0.79

WFBIX:

1.10

Omega Ratio

MFHQX:

1.09

WFBIX:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

MFHQX:

0.15

WFBIX:

0.29

Martin Ratio

MFHQX:

1.28

WFBIX:

1.86

Ulcer Index

MFHQX:

2.24%

WFBIX:

2.13%

Daily Std Dev

MFHQX:

5.39%

WFBIX:

5.28%

Max Drawdown

MFHQX:

-23.30%

WFBIX:

-18.65%

Current Drawdown

MFHQX:

-14.64%

WFBIX:

-8.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFHQX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than WFBIX's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MFHQX has underperformed WFBIX with an annualized return of 0.16%, while WFBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.29% annualized return.


MFHQX

YTD

0.62%

1M

0.83%

6M

-1.97%

1Y

3.29%

5Y*

-2.12%

10Y*

0.16%

WFBIX

YTD

0.54%

1M

0.77%

6M

-1.36%

1Y

3.96%

5Y*

-0.66%

10Y*

1.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFHQX vs. WFBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFHQX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than WFBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


MFHQX
BlackRock Total Return Fund
Expense ratio chart for MFHQX: current value at 1.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.45%
Expense ratio chart for WFBIX: current value at 0.05% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.05%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MFHQX vs. WFBIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFHQX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MFHQX is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MFHQX is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MFHQX is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MFHQX is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MFHQX is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MFHQX is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

WFBIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WFBIX is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WFBIX is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WFBIX is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WFBIX is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WFBIX is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WFBIX is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MFHQX vs. WFBIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Total Return Fund (MFHQX) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MFHQX, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.530.68
The chart of Sortino ratio for MFHQX, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.791.00
The chart of Omega ratio for MFHQX, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.091.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for MFHQX, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.150.27
The chart of Martin ratio for MFHQX, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.281.70
MFHQX
WFBIX

The current MFHQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the WFBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFHQX and WFBIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.53
0.68
MFHQX
WFBIX

Dividends

MFHQX vs. WFBIX - Dividend Comparison

MFHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than WFBIX's 3.68% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MFHQX
BlackRock Total Return Fund
3.79%3.78%3.12%1.96%1.01%1.39%2.20%2.34%2.15%1.83%2.00%2.59%
WFBIX
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
3.68%3.66%3.15%2.60%2.06%2.45%2.88%2.71%2.25%2.19%2.21%1.76%

Drawdowns

MFHQX vs. WFBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFHQX drawdown since its inception was -23.30%, which is greater than WFBIX's maximum drawdown of -18.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFHQX and WFBIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-14.64%
-8.57%
MFHQX
WFBIX

Volatility

MFHQX vs. WFBIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Total Return Fund (MFHQX) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) have volatilities of 1.40% and 1.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.40%
1.37%
MFHQX
WFBIX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab