PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFG vs. MAIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MFG vs. MAIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFG achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly higher than MAIN's -10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MFG has outperformed MAIN with an annualized return of 15.72%, while MAIN has yielded a comparatively lower 13.19% annualized return.


MFG

1D
1.68%
1M
11.39%
YTD
32.24%
6M
31.34%
1Y
78.46%
3Y*
51.80%
5Y*
30.84%
10Y*
15.72%

MAIN

1D
0.54%
1M
3.63%
YTD
-10.97%
6M
-12.92%
1Y
-3.16%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFG vs. MAIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
32.24%54.60%47.85%26.14%17.09%2.40%-15.06%3.00%-17.58%3.21%
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
-10.97%10.74%47.30%28.22%-11.37%48.31%-19.54%36.88%-8.27%16.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MFG and MAIN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2007

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MFG:

$118.10B

MAIN:

$4.72B

EPS

MFG:

¥101.00

MAIN:

$5.22

PE Ratio

MFG:

15.35

MAIN:

9.97

PEG Ratio

MFG:

0.56

MAIN:

1.14

PS Ratio

MFG:

2.22

MAIN:

6.63

PB Ratio

MFG:

1.66

MAIN:

1.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

MFG:

¥8.66T

MAIN:

$704.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MFG:

¥4.12T

MAIN:

$499.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

MFG:

¥1.63T

MAIN:

$396.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFG vs. MAIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFG
MFG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MAIN
MAIN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MAIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MAIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAIN Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFG vs. MAIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) and Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFGMAINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.99

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

-0.18

+3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

-0.35

+8.60

MFG vs. MAIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the MAIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFG and MAIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFG vs. MAIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFG drawdown since its inception was -80.57%, which is greater than MAIN's maximum drawdown of -64.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFG and MAIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFGMAINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.57%

-64.53%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.78%

-22.43%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.33%

-22.43%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

-27.06%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.87%

-64.53%

+14.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.06%

-18.28%

+14.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.82%

-7.31%

-53.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.31%

11.18%

-1.87%

Volatility

MFG vs. MAIN - Volatility Comparison

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) at 5.82%. This indicates that MFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFGMAINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.09%

5.82%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.20%

20.12%

+4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.69%

24.84%

+5.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.66%

21.57%

+8.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.49%

27.30%

-0.81%

Dividends

MFG vs. MAIN - Dividend Comparison

MFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than MAIN's 8.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
8.25%7.00%7.02%8.55%7.97%5.74%6.99%6.76%8.43%7.49%7.42%9.15%
MFG
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
0.96%2.68%3.20%3.73%4.34%2.76%2.71%0.00%0.00%1.86%3.77%3.10%

Financials

MFG vs. MAIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and Main Street Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00B1.00T1.50T2.00T20222023202420252026
2.27T
140.11M
(MFG) Total Revenue
(MAIN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MFG values in JPY, MAIN values in USD

MFG vs. MAIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and Main Street Capital Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
51.7%
0
Portfolio components
MFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 2.27T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.

MAIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Main Street Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 140.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 304.56B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

MAIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Main Street Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 140.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 232.94B and revenue of 2.27T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

MAIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Main Street Capital Corporation reported a net income of 90.82M and revenue of 140.11M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MFG and MAIN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFG has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to MAIN (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFG dropped -80.57% vs MAIN's -64.53%.

MFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFG and MAIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer