MFEX.L vs. PACW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MFEX.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both exchange-traded funds - MFEX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while PACW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MFEX.L returned 21.18% vs 30.29% for PACW.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFEX.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.

Performance

MFEX.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEX.L achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 11.92% return.

MFEX.L

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.82%
• YTD: 7.98%
• 6M: 9.56%
• 1Y: 21.18%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 83.37%
• 10Y*: —

PACW.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 12.31%
• 1Y: 30.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEX.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFEX.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU	7.98%	16.55%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	11.92%	9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEX.L and PACW.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.74

The correlation between MFEX.L and PACW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MFEX.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEX.L

MFEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
MFEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MFEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MFEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MFEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MFEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

PACW.L

PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEX.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFEX.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.89	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	3.95	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.55	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	4.27	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.75	17.43	-10.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFEX.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEX.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFEX.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	2.89	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	1.24	-0.94

Drawdowns

MFEX.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEX.L drawdown since its inception was -31.42%, which is greater than PACW.L's maximum drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEX.L and PACW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFEX.L	PACW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.42%	-17.68%	-13.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.99%	-7.06%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.46%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-3.02%	-2.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	1.73%	+1.40%

Volatility

MFEX.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that MFEX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFEX.L	PACW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	2.93%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.46%	7.75%	+3.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.97%	10.42%	+3.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	257.72%	13.91%	+243.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	207.66%	13.91%	+193.75%

MFEX.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEX.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MFEX.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

MFEX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than PACW.L's 1.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MFEX.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU	3.02%	3.27%	2.82%	2.56%	87.78%	48.73%	40.59%	3.30%	0.44%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFEX.L and PACW.L in my portfolio?

MFEX.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MFEX.L or PACW.L?

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFEX.L or PACW.L?

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for MFEX.L.

What is the main difference between MFEX.L and PACW.L?

MFEX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while PACW.L is Global Equities. MFEX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MFEX.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.