MFEX.L vs. CW8G.L
MFEX.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU) and CW8G.L (Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - MFEX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CW8G.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFEX.L returned 83.37%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for CW8G.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFEX.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CW8G.L.
Performance
MFEX.L vs. CW8G.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MFEX.L is traded in GBP, while CW8G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CW8G.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFEX.L achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly lower than CW8G.L's 9.97% return.
MFEX.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 20.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 83.37%
- 10Y*
- —
CW8G.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 26.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
MFEX.L vs. CW8G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEX.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU | 7.98% | 30.65% | 4.68% | 16.31% | 525.11% | 113.18% | 71.48% | 19.15% | -13.18% |
CW8G.L Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD | 9.97% | 12.11% | 20.95% | 17.29% | -8.45% | 23.58% | 11.88% | 23.12% | -9.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFEX.L and CW8G.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between MFEX.L and CW8G.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFEX.L vs. CW8G.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Industrials
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Technology
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Consumer Cyclical
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Utilities
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Healthcare
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Consumer Defensive
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Communication Services
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Energy
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Basic Materials
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Real Estate
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFEX.L vs. CW8G.L — Risk / Return Rank
MFEX.L
CW8G.L
MFEX.L vs. CW8G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) and Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFEX.L | CW8G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.51 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 4.00 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.75 | 15.91 | -9.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFEX.L | CW8G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.74 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.97 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.99 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
MFEX.L vs. CW8G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFEX.L drawdown since its inception was -31.42%, which is greater than CW8G.L's maximum drawdown of -25.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEX.L and CW8G.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFEX.L | CW8G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.42% | -25.60% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -6.67% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.95% | -18.88% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.63% | -18.88% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.15% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -3.10% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 1.68% | +1.45% |
Volatility
MFEX.L vs. CW8G.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8G.L) at 2.55%. This indicates that MFEX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW8G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFEX.L | CW8G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 2.55% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 7.27% | +4.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.97% | 9.75% | +4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 257.72% | 13.21% | +244.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 207.66% | 14.45% | +193.21% |
MFEX.L vs. CW8G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFEX.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CW8G.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFEX.L vs. CW8G.L - Dividend Comparison
MFEX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while CW8G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW8G.L Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFEX.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU | 3.02% | 3.27% | 2.82% | 2.56% | 87.78% | 48.73% | 40.59% | 3.30% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFEX.L and CW8G.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFEX.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFEX.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CW8G.L.
MFEX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CW8G.L is Global Equities. MFEX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CW8G.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MFEX.L and 0.28% for CW8G.L.
Find the right allocation for MFEX.L and CW8G.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer