PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MFEX.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU) and CEUR.L (Amundi MSCI Europe) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - MFEX.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while CEUR.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFEX.L returned 83.37%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for CEUR.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFEX.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for CEUR.L.

Performance

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MFEX.L is traded in GBP, while CEUR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CEUR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEX.L achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly higher than CEUR.L's 6.66% return.

MFEX.L

1D
0.46%
1M
4.82%
YTD
7.98%
6M
9.56%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
83.37%
10Y*
—

CEUR.L

1D
0.46%
1M
3.94%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.98%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MFEX.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU		7.98%30.65%4.68%16.31%525.11%113.18%71.48%19.15%-13.18%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe		6.66%24.46%4.90%12.93%-5.96%17.02%2.29%19.59%-10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEX.L and CEUR.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.94

The correlation between MFEX.L and CEUR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MFEX.L
CEUR.L

Financial Services

24.6%
25.1%

Industrials

21.4%
19.8%

Technology

16.6%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
6.2%

Utilities

6.1%
5.3%

Healthcare

5.8%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
7.2%

Communication Services

4.5%
3.4%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.7%

Financial Services

MFEX.L
24.6%
CEUR.L
25.1%

Industrials

MFEX.L
21.4%
CEUR.L
19.8%

Technology

MFEX.L
16.6%
CEUR.L
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

MFEX.L
8.5%
CEUR.L
6.2%

Utilities

MFEX.L
6.1%
CEUR.L
5.3%

Healthcare

MFEX.L
5.8%
CEUR.L
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

MFEX.L
4.6%
CEUR.L
7.2%

Communication Services

MFEX.L
4.5%
CEUR.L
3.4%

Energy

MFEX.L
4.2%
CEUR.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

MFEX.L
2.8%
CEUR.L
3.8%

Real Estate

MFEX.L
0.9%
CEUR.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU

Amundi MSCI Europe

Often compared with MFEX.L:
MFEX.L vs. IEFM.LMFEX.L vs. MEIKXMFEX.L vs. ACWIMFEX.L vs. 100D.LMFEX.L vs. 500G.LMFEX.L vs. ACWL.LMFEX.L vs. LDEG.L
Often compared with CEUR.L:
CEUR.L vs. DTLA.LCEUR.L vs. XS7R.LCEUR.L vs. XDWT.LCEUR.L vs. URTHCEUR.L vs. VERX.LCEUR.L vs. QQQCEUR.L vs. SPY

Return for Risk

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MFEX.L
MFEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MFEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MFEX.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.51
1.54

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.17
2.18

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.74

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

6.06

+0.70

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEX.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MFEX.LCEUR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.54

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.68

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.66

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.56

-0.26

Drawdowns

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEX.L drawdown since its inception was -31.42%, which is greater than CEUR.L's maximum drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEX.L and CEUR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MFEX.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.42%

-28.63%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-11.05%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-12.66%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.63%

-17.85%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-28.63%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-1.52%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-4.58%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

3.17%

-0.04%

Volatility

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU (MFEX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that MFEX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MFEX.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

4.25%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

10.53%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

12.44%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

257.72%

13.88%

+243.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

207.66%

14.97%

+192.69%

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEX.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MFEX.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

MFEX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while CEUR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFEX.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI EMU		3.02%3.27%2.82%2.56%87.78%48.73%40.59%3.30%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.96, MFEX.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for MFEX.L.

MFEX.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CEUR.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MFEX.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEX.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer