MFEM vs. TLTE
MFEM (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and TLTE (FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index) are both exchange-traded funds - MFEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index, while TLTE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFEM returned 7.53%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for TLTE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFEM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TLTE.
Performance
MFEM vs. TLTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 22.43% return, which is significantly higher than TLTE's 20.12% return.
MFEM
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 22.43%
- 6M
- 23.23%
- 1Y
- 40.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- —
TLTE
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 20.12%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 39.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
MFEM vs. TLTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 22.43% | 25.33% | 4.73% | 15.14% | -19.50% | 10.77% | 11.33% | 15.26% | -14.64% | 4.86% |
TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index | 20.12% | 30.21% | 3.53% | 13.62% | -17.31% | 4.79% | 12.10% | 14.51% | -17.44% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFEM and TLTE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MFEM and TLTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFEM vs. TLTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFEM
TLTE
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
MFEM
TLTE
Financial Services
MFEM
TLTE
Basic Materials
MFEM
TLTE
Industrials
MFEM
TLTE
Consumer Cyclical
MFEM
TLTE
Energy
MFEM
TLTE
Communication Services
MFEM
TLTE
Utilities
MFEM
TLTE
Consumer Defensive
MFEM
TLTE
Healthcare
MFEM
TLTE
Real Estate
MFEM
TLTE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFEM vs. TLTE — Risk / Return Rank
MFEM
TLTE
MFEM vs. TLTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFEM | TLTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.08 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 11.60 | -0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFEM vs. TLTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -43.32%, roughly equal to the maximum TLTE drawdown of -44.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and TLTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFEM | TLTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.32% | -44.21% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -13.04% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.22% | -17.43% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.84% | -32.65% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.95% | -5.06% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -12.12% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 3.45% | +0.29% |
Volatility
MFEM vs. TLTE - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) have volatilities of 11.67% and 11.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFEM | TLTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.67% | 11.78% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.63% | 19.21% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.40% | 21.00% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 17.45% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.63% | 18.60% | +1.03% |
MFEM vs. TLTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFEM vs. TLTE - Dividend Comparison
MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than TLTE's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.27% | 2.77% | 5.89% | 4.01% | 7.01% | 29.96% | 1.70% | 2.37% | 1.18% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index | 3.26% | 3.76% | 3.73% | 4.03% | 4.42% | 3.21% | 1.95% | 3.23% | 3.02% | 2.12% | 2.30% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, MFEM and TLTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TLTE has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to MFEM (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEM dropped -43.32% vs TLTE's -44.21%.
On 5-year performance, MFEM leads with 7.53% vs 7.23% for TLTE. On fees, MFEM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MFEM has been the lower-risk option at 11.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFEM has performed better with a 7.53% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFEM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TLTE.
TLTE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.27% for MFEM.
MFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TLTE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. MFEM tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index, while TLTE tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MFEM and 0.59% for TLTE.
MFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFEM and TLTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer