MFEM vs. LTPZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ).

MFEM and LTPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFEM is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009. Both MFEM and LTPZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MFEM vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MFEM vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	8.20%	25.33%	4.73%	15.14%	-19.50%	10.77%	11.33%	15.26%	-14.64%	4.82%
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF	-1.39%	4.00%	-4.80%	0.96%	-31.71%	7.02%	24.89%	17.47%	-7.22%	3.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's -1.39% return.

MFEM

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -9.87%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 6M: 12.54%
• 1Y: 35.23%
• 3Y*: 16.17%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: —

LTPZ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -4.79%
• YTD: -1.39%
• 6M: -2.84%
• 1Y: -2.68%
• 3Y*: -2.37%
• 5Y*: -4.68%
• 10Y*: 0.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEM vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.

MFEM

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF

LTPZ

PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF

Return for Risk

MFEM vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEM

MFEM Risk / Return Rank: 88
MFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

LTPZ

LTPZ Risk / Return Rank: 8
LTPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
LTPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
LTPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LTPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
LTPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEM vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFEM	LTPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	-0.24	+2.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	-0.24	+2.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	0.97	+0.40
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	-0.21	+2.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.38	-0.43	+10.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFEM vs. LTPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the LTPZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEM and LTPZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFEM	LTPZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	-0.24	+2.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	-0.30	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.21	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between MFEM and LTPZ is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MFEM vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison

MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than LTPZ's 4.64% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.56%	2.77%	5.89%	4.01%	7.01%	29.96%	1.70%	2.37%	1.18%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF	4.64%	4.64%	3.71%	3.71%	8.38%	3.56%	1.42%	1.74%	3.05%	2.25%	2.32%	0.71%

Drawdowns

MFEM vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -43.32%, which is greater than LTPZ's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and LTPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFEM	LTPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.32%	-40.99%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.86%	-7.82%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.39%	-40.99%	+9.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.31%	-33.95%	+23.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.67%	-12.19%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	3.92%	-0.56%

Volatility

MFEM vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) has a higher volatility of 10.30% compared to PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) at 3.99%. This indicates that MFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFEM	LTPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.30%	3.99%	+6.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.44%	6.46%	+7.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.72%	11.28%	+7.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.12%	15.92%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.22%	15.10%	+4.12%