MFEM vs. BOND
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND).
MFEM and BOND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFEM is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. BOND is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Mar 1, 2012.
Performance
MFEM vs. BOND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFEM vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 8.20% | 25.33% | 4.73% | 15.14% | -19.50% | 10.77% | 11.33% | 15.26% | -14.64% | 4.82% |
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | -0.02% | 8.39% | 2.77% | 6.48% | -14.57% | -0.77% | 7.80% | 8.54% | 0.08% | -0.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly higher than BOND's -0.02% return.
MFEM
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -9.87%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- 1Y
- 35.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
BOND
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFEM vs. BOND - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BOND's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFEM vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank
MFEM
BOND
MFEM vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFEM | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 1.08 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 1.51 | +0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.20 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 1.58 | +1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.38 | 4.65 | +5.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFEM | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.08 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.11 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.63 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFEM and BOND is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MFEM vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison
MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than BOND's 5.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.56% | 2.77% | 5.89% | 4.01% | 7.01% | 29.96% | 1.70% | 2.37% | 1.18% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF | 5.18% | 5.11% | 5.02% | 4.06% | 3.44% | 2.58% | 2.66% | 3.38% | 3.18% | 2.87% | 2.85% | 4.14% |
Drawdowns
MFEM vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -43.32%, which is greater than BOND's maximum drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and BOND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFEM | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.32% | -19.71% | -23.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -3.29% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.39% | -19.71% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.31% | -2.06% | -8.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -3.53% | -8.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 1.12% | +2.24% |
Volatility
MFEM vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) has a higher volatility of 10.30% compared to PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) at 1.82%. This indicates that MFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFEM | BOND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.30% | 1.82% | +8.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 2.70% | +11.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 4.72% | +14.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 5.73% | +10.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 5.07% | +14.15% |