PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFEKX vs. MMHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFEKX vs. MMHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) and MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEKX achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly higher than MMHYX's 2.52% return. Over the past 10 years, MFEKX has outperformed MMHYX with an annualized return of 17.62%, while MMHYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.85% annualized return.


MFEKX

1D
-1.27%
1M
3.17%
YTD
4.99%
6M
4.37%
1Y
15.48%
3Y*
26.14%
5Y*
13.85%
10Y*
17.62%

MMHYX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.91%
YTD
2.52%
6M
2.92%
1Y
8.29%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
2.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEKX vs. MMHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
4.99%12.44%49.62%36.27%-31.07%23.71%31.77%37.82%2.40%30.97%
MMHYX
MFS Municipal High Income Fund
2.52%5.02%6.72%5.30%-14.64%5.31%3.39%9.94%2.09%7.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEKX and MMHYX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011

-0.03

The correlation between MFEKX and MMHYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFEKX vs. MMHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEKX
MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MMHYX
MMHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MMHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MMHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEKX vs. MMHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) and MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFEKXMMHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.62

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

2.96

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

10.42

-7.34

MFEKX vs. MMHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the MMHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEKX and MMHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFEKXMMHYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

2.52

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.19

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.59

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.12

-0.25

Drawdowns

MFEKX vs. MMHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEKX drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, which is greater than MMHYX's maximum drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEKX and MMHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFEKXMMHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.06%

-23.28%

-12.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.27%

-2.91%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-7.71%

-15.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.06%

-19.89%

-16.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

-19.89%

-16.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-0.13%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-2.88%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

0.83%

+4.47%

Volatility

MFEKX vs. MMHYX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX) at 1.33%. This indicates that MFEKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFEKXMMHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

1.33%

+2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

2.48%

+9.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

3.43%

+12.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.89%

4.96%

+16.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

4.85%

+16.35%

MFEKX vs. MMHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEKX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than MMHYX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFEKX vs. MMHYX - Dividend Comparison

MFEKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.12%, more than MMHYX's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
14.12%14.82%25.31%4.82%1.04%2.74%3.55%1.57%3.88%2.49%1.70%3.64%
MMHYX
MFS Municipal High Income Fund
4.36%5.77%3.91%3.59%3.03%2.95%3.57%3.99%4.18%4.38%4.31%4.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFEKX and MMHYX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEKX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to MMHYX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEKX dropped -36.06% vs MMHYX's -23.28%.

MMHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEKX and MMHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer