MFEIX vs. CIF
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Growth I (MFEIX) and MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF).
MFEIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jul 10, 1997. CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988.
Performance
MFEIX vs. CIF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFEIX vs. CIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEIX MFS Growth I | -13.62% | 12.34% | 49.67% | 36.15% | -31.14% | 23.59% | 31.65% | 37.69% | 2.30% | 30.86% |
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -2.21% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFEIX achieves a -13.62% return, which is significantly lower than CIF's -2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MFEIX has outperformed CIF with an annualized return of 15.44%, while CIF has yielded a comparatively lower 6.17% annualized return.
MFEIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- -13.62%
- 6M
- -14.22%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- 21.33%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.44%
CIF
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFEIX vs. CIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFEIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CIF's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFEIX vs. CIF — Risk / Return Rank
MFEIX
CIF
MFEIX vs. CIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth I (MFEIX) and MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFEIX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 0.38 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | 0.60 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.09 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 0.51 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | 1.92 | -1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFEIX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.38 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.05 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.32 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.16 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFEIX and CIF is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MFEIX vs. CIF - Dividend Comparison
MFEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.36%, more than CIF's 10.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEIX MFS Growth I | 17.36% | 14.99% | 25.47% | 4.86% | 1.05% | 2.76% | 3.57% | 1.57% | 3.78% | 2.50% | 1.61% | 3.65% |
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
Drawdowns
MFEIX vs. CIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFEIX drawdown since its inception was -72.24%, roughly equal to the maximum CIF drawdown of -69.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEIX and CIF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFEIX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.24% | -69.23% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.30% | -9.68% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.11% | -44.92% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.11% | -45.24% | +9.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.30% | -23.30% | +6.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.85% | -17.80% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 2.65% | +2.41% |
Volatility
MFEIX vs. CIF - Volatility Comparison
MFS Growth I (MFEIX) and MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) have volatilities of 5.58% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFEIX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 5.35% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 7.87% | +4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.56% | 13.40% | +8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 16.85% | +5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 19.43% | +1.73% |