MFC vs. SHV
MFC (Manulife Financial Corporation) is a stock, while SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. Over the past 10 years, MFC returned 15.19%/yr vs 2.23%/yr for SHV. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MFC vs. SHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFC achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly higher than SHV's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MFC has outperformed SHV with an annualized return of 15.19%, while SHV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.23% annualized return.
MFC
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- 1Y
- 24.20%
- 3Y*
- 31.36%
- 5Y*
- 18.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.19%
SHV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
MFC vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 7.25% | 22.95% | 45.75% | 31.13% | -1.18% | 12.17% | -7.18% | 49.19% | -29.89% | 22.17% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.42% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFC and SHV is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2007 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFC vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank
MFC
SHV
MFC vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -147.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 53.77 | -52.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 431.38 | -429.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | 2,419.80 | -2,414.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 19.49 | -18.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 11.56 | -10.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 8.09 | -7.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 4.50 | -4.16 |
Drawdowns
MFC vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFC drawdown since its inception was -83.61%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFC and SHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.61% | -0.45% | -83.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -0.01% | -12.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.75% | -0.03% | -16.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.99% | -0.40% | -26.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.44% | -0.45% | -56.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | 0.00% | -3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.42% | -0.03% | -29.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 0.00% | +4.63% |
Volatility
MFC vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison
Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that MFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFC | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 0.05% | +8.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.81% | 0.12% | +15.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 0.20% | +20.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 0.29% | +23.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.42% | 0.28% | +28.14% |
Dividends
MFC vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison
MFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than SHV's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.50% | 3.45% | 4.16% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 4.91% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 4.15% | 5.38% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFC and SHV have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFC has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFC dropped -83.61% vs SHV's -0.45%.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFC and SHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer