MFC vs. AVGO
MFC (Manulife Financial Corporation) and AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) are both stocks. MFC operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while AVGO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, MFC returned 16.48%/yr vs 40.96%/yr for AVGO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MFC vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFC achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than AVGO's 10.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MFC has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 16.48%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 40.96% annualized return.
MFC
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.59%
- 5Y*
- 20.37%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
AVGO
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 50.41%
- 3Y*
- 67.17%
- 5Y*
- 55.09%
- 10Y*
- 40.96%
MFC vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 13.26% | 22.95% | 45.75% | 31.13% | -1.18% | 12.17% | -7.18% | 49.19% | -29.89% | 22.17% |
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 10.62% | 50.63% | 110.49% | 104.18% | -13.27% | 56.48% | 44.88% | 29.05% | 2.18% | 48.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFC and AVGO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009 | 0.36 |
The correlation between MFC and AVGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MFC:
$48.69B
AVGO:
$1.86T
MFC:
CA$4.06
AVGO:
$6.01
MFC:
13.89
AVGO:
63.58
MFC:
4.87
AVGO:
0.79
MFC:
1.12
AVGO:
24.70
MFC:
1.54
AVGO:
21.24
MFC:
CA$79.35B
AVGO:
$75.47B
MFC:
CA$26.46B
AVGO:
$50.53B
MFC:
CA$8.26B
AVGO:
$41.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFC vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank
MFC
AVGO
MFC vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFC | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.77 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | 4.11 | +2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFC vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFC drawdown since its inception was -83.61%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFC and AVGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFC | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.61% | -48.30% | -35.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -28.67% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.75% | -41.15% | +24.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.99% | -41.15% | +14.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.44% | -48.30% | -9.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -20.66% | +20.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.39% | -7.98% | -21.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 12.30% | -7.87% |
Volatility
MFC vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) is 8.02%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 20.53%. This indicates that MFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFC | AVGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 20.53% | -12.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 35.04% | -19.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.74% | 45.57% | -24.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 43.39% | -19.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.39% | 39.52% | -11.13% |
Dividends
MFC vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison
MFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than AVGO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.65% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.31% | 3.45% | 4.16% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 4.91% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 4.15% | 5.38% |
Financials
MFC vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manulife Financial Corporation and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MFC vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison
MFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.31B and revenue of 12.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
AVGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
MFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
AVGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.
MFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
AVGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MFC and AVGO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGO has higher volatility (20.53%) compared to MFC (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFC dropped -83.61% vs AVGO's -48.30%.
MFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFC and AVGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer