MFC.TO vs. NA.TO
MFC.TO (Manulife Financial Corporation) and NA.TO (National Bank of Canada) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — MFC.TO in Insurance - Life, NA.TO in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, MFC.TO returned 17.33%/yr vs 21.48%/yr for NA.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MFC.TO vs. NA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFC.TO achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly lower than NA.TO's 22.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MFC.TO has underperformed NA.TO with an annualized return of 17.33%, while NA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.48% annualized return.
MFC.TO
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 9.90%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 17.52%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 35.54%
- 5Y*
- 23.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.33%
NA.TO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 22.40%
- 6M
- 23.26%
- 1Y
- 59.71%
- 3Y*
- 33.78%
- 5Y*
- 22.51%
- 10Y*
- 21.48%
MFC.TO vs. NA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC.TO Manulife Financial Corporation | 15.19% | 17.45% | 57.53% | 28.33% | 5.83% | 11.57% | -9.19% | 41.99% | -23.25% | 13.30% |
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 22.40% | 36.15% | 34.65% | 15.53% | -1.45% | 39.02% | 4.01% | 34.04% | -6.92% | 19.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFC.TO and NA.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MFC.TO and NA.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
MFC.TO:
CA$94.62B
NA.TO:
CA$82.13B
MFC.TO:
CA$3.78
NA.TO:
CA$11.69
MFC.TO:
14.89
NA.TO:
17.95
MFC.TO:
5.22
NA.TO:
5.02
MFC.TO:
1.78
NA.TO:
3.03
MFC.TO:
2.15
NA.TO:
2.65
MFC.TO:
CA$53.61B
NA.TO:
CA$27.33B
MFC.TO:
CA$27.15B
NA.TO:
CA$14.01B
MFC.TO:
CA$8.25B
NA.TO:
CA$6.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFC.TO vs. NA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MFC.TO
NA.TO
MFC.TO vs. NA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) and National Bank of Canada (NA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFC.TO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.70 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 6.73 | -4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 22.50 | -13.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFC.TO vs. NA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than NA.TO's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFC.TO and NA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFC.TO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.97% | -55.45% | -22.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.71% | -8.99% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.63% | -22.58% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.05% | -22.58% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.68% | -48.22% | -4.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.68% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -6.76% | -21.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 2.68% | +1.28% |
Volatility
MFC.TO vs. NA.TO - Volatility Comparison
Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) at 6.17%. This indicates that MFC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFC.TO | NA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 6.17% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.42% | 13.64% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 16.05% | +3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 17.50% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 20.94% | +5.15% |
Dividends
MFC.TO vs. NA.TO - Dividend Comparison
MFC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than NA.TO's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC.TO Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.28% | 3.53% | 3.62% | 4.99% | 5.47% | 4.85% | 4.94% | 3.79% | 4.70% | 3.13% | 3.09% | 2.39% |
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 2.31% | 2.75% | 3.36% | 4.03% | 4.03% | 3.11% | 3.96% | 3.77% | 4.44% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 5.16% |
Financials
MFC.TO vs. NA.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manulife Financial Corporation and National Bank of Canada. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MFC.TO vs. NA.TO - Profitability Comparison
MFC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.28B and revenue of 12.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
NA.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 3.66B and revenue of 8.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.
MFC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
NA.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 1.62B and revenue of 8.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.
MFC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 12.28B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
NA.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Bank of Canada reported a net income of 1.23B and revenue of 8.07B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MFC.TO and NA.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MFC.TO and NA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer