PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFALX vs. MEIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFALX vs. MEIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund (MFALX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFALX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than MEIAX's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MFALX has underperformed MEIAX with an annualized return of 1.49%, while MEIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.90% annualized return.


MFALX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-2.31%
6M
-0.16%
YTD
0.43%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
3.24%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
1.49%
ALL TIME*
4.41%

MEIAX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.20%
6M
6.86%
YTD
10.34%
1Y
18.52%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.90%
ALL TIME*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MFALX vs. MEIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFALX
MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund
0.43%4.49%1.31%5.87%-11.27%1.87%4.05%7.24%1.04%4.49%
MEIAX
MFS Value Fund
10.34%12.97%11.60%7.92%-6.25%25.11%3.71%29.73%-10.11%16.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MFALX and MEIAX is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1995

-0.06

The correlation between MFALX and MEIAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFALX vs. MEIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFALX
MFALX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MFALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFALX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MFALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFALX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIAX
MEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFALX vs. MEIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund (MFALX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFALXMEIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.27

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.37

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

8.30

-1.08

MFALX vs. MEIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the MEIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFALX and MEIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFALX vs. MEIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFALX drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum MEIAX drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFALX and MEIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFALXMEIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.68%

-52.85%

+36.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-6.78%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-13.26%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.60%

-17.72%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.68%

-36.71%

+20.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-1.05%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-6.51%

+4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.95%

-1.00%

Volatility

MFALX vs. MEIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund (MFALX) is 1.05%, while MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that MFALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFALXMEIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

2.76%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

7.50%

-4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30%

10.58%

-7.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

13.88%

-9.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.36%

16.47%

-12.11%

MFALX vs. MEIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFALX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIAX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFALX vs. MEIAX - Dividend Comparison

MFALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than MEIAX's 8.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIAX
MFS Value Fund
8.60%9.34%9.10%8.21%7.36%3.10%2.42%2.97%3.36%3.87%2.84%5.73%
MFALX
MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund
3.00%4.22%2.79%2.34%1.62%1.57%2.21%2.92%3.32%3.39%3.59%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFALX and MEIAX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEIAX has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to MFALX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFALX dropped -16.68% vs MEIAX's -52.85%.

MFALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFALX and MEIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer