MFALX vs. FXIEX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFALX (MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund) and FXIEX (PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MFALX returned 1.72%/yr vs 2.91%/yr for FXIEX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFALX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FXIEX.

Performance

MFALX vs. FXIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund (MFALX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MFALX having a 1.88% return and FXIEX slightly lower at 1.81%. Over the past 10 years, MFALX has underperformed FXIEX with an annualized return of 1.72%, while FXIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.91% annualized return.

MFALX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.17%
• 1Y: 7.99%
• 3Y*: 3.83%
• 5Y*: 0.40%
• 10Y*: 1.72%

FXIEX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 6.90%
• 3Y*: 5.23%
• 5Y*: 1.67%
• 10Y*: 2.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFALX vs. FXIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFALX MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund	1.88%	4.49%	1.31%	5.87%	-11.27%	1.87%	4.05%	7.24%	1.04%	4.49%
FXIEX PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE	1.81%	3.37%	5.16%	8.92%	-10.89%	2.19%	7.22%	8.45%	1.00%	7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MFALX and FXIEX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2012	0.70

The correlation between MFALX and FXIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MFALX vs. FXIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFALX

MFALX Risk / Return Rank: 62
MFALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MFALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
MFALX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MFALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MFALX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FXIEX

FXIEX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FXIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FXIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FXIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FXIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FXIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFALX vs. FXIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund (MFALX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFALX	FXIEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.49	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	4.35	-0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.61	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	3.61	-1.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.45	11.89	-3.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFALX vs. FXIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FXIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFALX and FXIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFALX	FXIEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.49	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.40	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.73	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.60	+0.61

Drawdowns

MFALX vs. FXIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFALX drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, which is greater than FXIEX's maximum drawdown of -15.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFALX and FXIEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFALX	FXIEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.68%	-15.25%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.24%	-2.42%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.01%	-5.56%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.68%	-15.25%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.68%	-15.25%	-1.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	0.00%	-0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.95%	-2.90%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.66%	-0.73%

Volatility

MFALX vs. FXIEX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund (MFALX) and PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE (FXIEX) have volatilities of 1.24% and 1.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFALX	FXIEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	1.29%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	2.19%	+0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30%	3.55%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.61%	4.37%	+0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.35%	4.10%	+0.25%

MFALX vs. FXIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFALX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FXIEX's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFALX vs. FXIEX - Dividend Comparison

MFALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than FXIEX's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXIEX PIMCO Fixed Income SHares: Series TE	2.79%	2.75%	4.53%	3.98%	3.25%	2.63%	3.37%	3.63%	3.79%	2.67%	0.00%	0.00%
MFALX MFS Alabama Municipal Bond Fund	3.21%	4.22%	2.79%	2.34%	1.62%	1.57%	2.21%	2.92%	3.32%	3.39%	3.59%	3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFALX and FXIEX in my portfolio?

MFALX and FXIEX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFALX or FXIEX?

FXIEX has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to MFALX (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFALX dropped -16.68% vs FXIEX's -15.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FXIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.