PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEUD.L vs. ASML.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEUD.L vs. ASML.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MEUD.L is traded in GBp, while ASML.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ASML.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEUD.L achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than ASML.AS's 75.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MEUD.L has underperformed ASML.AS with an annualized return of 11.01%, while ASML.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 37.00% annualized return.


MEUD.L

1D
1.76%
1M
3.61%
YTD
7.81%
6M
9.49%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
11.01%

ASML.AS

1D
3.38%
1M
23.34%
YTD
75.68%
6M
73.70%
1Y
150.58%
3Y*
35.32%
5Y*
24.51%
10Y*
37.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEUD.L vs. ASML.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
7.81%26.51%3.65%13.48%-5.04%17.06%3.85%20.40%-9.59%15.43%
ASML.AS
ASML Holding N.V.
75.68%44.42%-4.20%33.94%-24.10%68.14%60.70%84.23%-3.73%43.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MEUD.L and ASML.AS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2013

0.60

The correlation between MEUD.L and ASML.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEUD.L vs. ASML.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML.AS
ASML.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEUD.L vs. ASML.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEUD.LASML.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.52

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

9.46

-7.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

23.53

-16.76

MEUD.L vs. ASML.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEUD.L and ASML.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEUD.L vs. ASML.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEUD.L drawdown since its inception was -28.57%, smaller than the maximum ASML.AS drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUD.L and ASML.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEUD.LASML.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.57%

-50.98%

+22.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-15.20%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-43.84%

+31.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.09%

-46.27%

+29.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.57%

-46.27%

+17.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-13.00%

+6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

6.15%

-3.23%

Volatility

MEUD.L vs. ASML.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) is 3.54%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML.AS) has a volatility of 13.42%. This indicates that MEUD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEUD.LASML.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

13.42%

-9.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

30.82%

-20.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

39.80%

-27.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

38.24%

-22.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

33.93%

-17.00%

Dividends

MEUD.L vs. ASML.AS - Dividend Comparison

MEUD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML.AS
ASML Holding N.V.
0.46%0.71%0.92%0.87%1.28%0.47%0.64%1.19%1.02%0.83%0.98%0.85%
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEUD.L and ASML.AS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEUD.L and ASML.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer