METY.L vs. TSLD.L
METY.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP) and TSLD.L (IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METY.L returned -33.97% vs 2.89% for TSLD.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
METY.L vs. TSLD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
METY.L is traded in USD, while TSLD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TSLD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METY.L achieves a -27.52% return, which is significantly lower than TSLD.L's -24.56% return.
METY.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- -27.52%
- 6M
- -27.10%
- 1Y
- -33.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- -24.56%
- 6M
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METY.L vs. TSLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METY.L IncomeShares META Options ETP | -27.52% | 6.34% | 0.58% |
TSLD.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP | -24.56% | 16.02% | 12.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between METY.L and TSLD.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METY.L vs. TSLD.L — Risk / Return Rank
METY.L
TSLD.L
METY.L vs. TSLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP (TSLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METY.L | TSLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.07 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 0.07 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 0.11 | -1.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METY.L vs. TSLD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METY.L drawdown since its inception was -40.70%, smaller than the maximum TSLD.L drawdown of -46.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METY.L and TSLD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METY.L | TSLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.70% | -46.52% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.70% | -43.90% | +3.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.22% | -40.29% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.49% | -25.82% | +10.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.04% | 25.70% | -2.66% |
Volatility
METY.L vs. TSLD.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) and IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP (TSLD.L) have volatilities of 10.22% and 10.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METY.L | TSLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.22% | 10.48% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.00% | 25.90% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.27% | 55.14% | -24.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.85% | 55.15% | -24.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.85% | 55.15% | -24.30% |
METY.L vs. TSLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both METY.L and TSLD.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
METY.L vs. TSLD.L - Dividend Comparison
METY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.26%, less than TSLD.L's 34.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METY.L IncomeShares META Options ETP | 21.26% | 19.94% | 3.15% |
TSLD.L IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP GBP | 34.52% | 58.23% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METY.L and TSLD.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METY.L and TSLD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
Find the right allocation for METY.L and TSLD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer